welcome to my talk page. feel free to do whatever you want here. vandalize it, comment on my edits, have an admin block me over a nonexistent edit war, whatever you want. or at least whatever isn't illegal enough to get you blocked lmao

Fun facts edit

Fun fact #1: Your signature contains pink and green text.
Fun fact #2: I set my interwiki links to be pink and my redirects to be green
Fun fact #3: I changed my global CSS so the links in your signature appear blue.

--QuickQuokka [⁠talkcontribs] 23:26, 18 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

(P.S. No hate, this is just a fun coincidence  ) --QuickQuokka [⁠talkcontribs] 23:26, 18 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
lol
i only used those specific colors because they look hideous in light mode and
thank(s) cogsan(give me attention)(see my deeds) 11:30, 19 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Fun fact #1: You just wasted 2+ seconds reading this not so fun fact
Fun fact #2: Nobody lives in Antartica
Fun fact #3: This fact is a useless placeholder DonDistalimino (talk) 16:37, 2 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
joke's on you, i can read really really fast ლ(òvóლ) cogsan(give me attention)(see my deeds) 17:41, 2 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Fun fact #1 An octopus can fit in holes as small as 2cm
Fun fact #2 The average human anus is 3-5cm
Fun fact #3 A racoon can fit in 4in holes
Bonus fun fact A human anus can stretch up to 7in wide Abdullah raji (talk) 07:26, 28 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
...should i be worried that i knew the second fact from cruelty squad shitposts? cogsan (give me attention) (see my deeds) 12:21, 28 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
Probably. Abdullah raji (talk) 16:44, 28 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Strike the advice edit

Hello. Here[1] you are guilty of exactly what everyone is warning and blocking that user for. You are exactly as much of a newbie as that guy is. Stop stalking other people's talk pages, stop giving terrible advice, stop contradicting the word of every single other person on the entire page, stop dogpiling on already handled situations. While admitting you're unqualified, you gave bad and needless advice anyway, purely for the sake of inserting yourself to hear your head rattle, and you worded it with gibberish about "bad vibes". Go back there and don't delete it but strike through it all with a tiny note of apology. Look up how to do strike through formatting. Users can be blocked for doing that. Thanks. — Smuckola(talk) 19:43, 5 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

harsh, but not harsher than i was
i'll deal with it in a few minutes, because my pc is going through some "technical issues" cogsan (give me attention) (see my deeds) 19:59, 5 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
It is not harsh whatsoever. It is merely direct. It's just basic and obvious info, and the minimum at that. It is simply not coddling, that's all. That is unlike all the other editors who helped enable and wind up that other arrogant editor until they too were forced to address him like I did from the start and then block him and lecture him ten times more than I ever did. All for nothing. If he ever changes, it will be 0% due to coddling or lecturing and 100% due to blocking. Unlike him though, you seem to be really nice! I'm sorry about your PC, and having computers is almost as terrible as not having computers! I'll go through your edit history and see if I can "thank" bomb you, and I thank you for being a positive and helpful person from what little I've seen at a glance! Let me know if I can help with anything. — Smuckola(talk) 20:27, 5 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
alright, it's struck
sorry for the delay cogsan (give me attention) (see my deeds) 20:30, 5 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
p.s. The real culprit is Wikipedia, which lures people in here, as if it's easy, with no real training or credentials, and set them (and thus all of us) up to get punished for it. Truly truly, one of the biggest scams online next to its fundraiser spam. ;) — Smuckola(talk) 20:32, 5 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
honestly, i don't feel like his situation is worth worrying about too much
his block will expire in 5 days, and i don't really think he'll go on a vandalizing rampage for revenge or anything
he's absolutely more interested in and maybe capable of improving wikipedia than me, for starters cogsan (give me attention) (see my deeds) 20:36, 5 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
...oh
it was unstruck
not gonna question it cogsan (give me attention) (see my deeds) 13:17, 6 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
Okay. You're completely wrong about him, and about the Wikipedia concepts you're winding him up about, and you just won't stop. In addition to you aggressively contradicting all the experts including an admin handling a blocked abuser, a lot of what you said to him on his talk page was extremely incorrect and misguided. You called counter-vandalism a basic activity and even gave him a pointless dare of 3 minutes to be as fast as possible with it, when in reality counter-vandalism requires a training course and tons of discernment, after lots more experience than both of you combined. Every word you said about MelonDS's notability and sources is just absolutely hopelessly wrong, just like here so you need to read WP:RS another few thousand times because that is the worst cardinal sin against the very existence of the encyclopedia. Another editor was also forced to warn you on his talk page.
You are taking one of the worst problem editors I've seen in a long time and just winding him up. Even after multiple other editors (including one admin) had said "let me spell it out for you", you thought you were the first to say "let me spell it out for you". He said countless times and demonstrated exhaustively that he is explicitly committed to anti-encyclopedic principles, is at war against the encyclopedia, and loves doing wrong things and fighting right things. That's the definition of bad faith. And you haven't even bothered to catch up with that history anyway. Multiple editors have said he is blatantly incompetent, and one said he is the absolute height of clinically arrogant and oblivious incompetency as per the Dunning-Kruger effect (overvaluing self competency and devaluing everybody else's). By contrast, you're actually decent, on the other side of the Dunning-Kruger effect, of devaluing your own competency and overvaluing his. Think about it! That means he is literally dragging you down. No he is NOT more able or willing than you. You're more competent AND in good faith!
He accidentally said one correct thing, that your comment you struck is not uncivil, though of course he violated WP:OTHERSCOMMENTS in the process. And you left all your direct meddling and contradictions intact, but whatever. None of your comments to him are uncivil, just wrongly meddling with a severely problematic and fellow newbie user. Anyway, omg, c'mon. Stop. — Smuckola(talk) 01:13, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
fine, even if i'll admit to disagreeing about him not being more able (that's not a matter of me being competent or not, it's a matter of the pc i use on weekdays blue screening at any given chance and having most reliable sources blocked)
either way, it's probably time for a self-imposed interaction ban and retraction of that time i said i wouldn't mind helping work on a draft
if all goes well, this will end here cogsan (give me attention) (see my deeds) 11:09, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Greetings. edit

I heard you have a photo of garlic bread. Can I see it? Many thanks. Parameci (talk) 18:30, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
it's breadgarlic
i also said in that specific line that the picture looked "like shit"
i don't think this can be used on wikipedia, no matter how you twist it
which is a shame, because despite looking nothing like the disgusting american idea of garlic bread, it was actually really good cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 18:51, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Undid revision at List of Pokémon edit

Greetings. I have noticed that my recent edit about Slaking has been reverted. I agreed that up to this point there's no individual article of Slaking, and I don't think I need to create one.

However, the current link directs readers to a disambiguation page, and my intention of adding Slaking (Pokémon) into the link is to disambiguate them and directs the readers to this page instead: List of generation III Pokémon (where more details about Slaking can be briefly found).

I hope this clears up the confusion.

Rimapavadria (talk) 09:08, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

oh, i clicked the wrong link when i undid it, and didn't notice the disambig
my bad lol cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 11:02, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Color edit

#30cb5a is certainly the best color. I can very much agree with that. Coulomb1 (talk) 00:33, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Sounds riveting! edit

"ultrakill is like getting your blood replaced with adrenaline via the urethra or something". That made me chuckle! soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 21:54, 6 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

sorry, the riveter is actually from dusk cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 11:32, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Barnstar of Good Humor
"JoJo's Abnormal proceeding" LMAO. anyway, u made me laugh with that, enjoy this barnstar. Babysharkboss2!! AC/DC (Talk Page btw) 21:09, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
thanks lol
no regerts cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 12:06, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Penguin pokemon edit

Hello, I see you nominated Penguin pokemon for RfD, but it seems someone removed its log entry from the discussion page. Could you please fix it so that I can mark it as reviewed? Thanks! DreamRimmer (talk) 16:57, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

got it
apparently time4learning accidentally replaced it with ROADCROSSING! cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 17:02, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. — DreamRimmer (talk) 17:07, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for February 9 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alakhazam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alakazam. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:04, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

oopsie poopsie
pokémon it is >:3 cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 18:07, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

A cheeseburger for you! edit

  For just being awesome! - The   Master of    clockHedgehogs clock (always up for a conversation!) 16:34, 18 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
thanks lmao :D cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 12:20, 19 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
You're welcome! - Master of Hedgehogs (converse) (hate that hedgehog!) 12:04, 20 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

+1 the above cheeseburger edit

Your userpage and wikiwide comments are very funny in an extremely drab, boring Wikipedia. Thank you. Dialmayo 13:09, 7 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

thought this was sent yesterday, whoops
thanks cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 19:03, 8 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

another +1 for the cheeseburger edit

I love that you have a pic of your cat at the bottom of your userpage. You are a funny guy and I appreciate you for that. Wiki is a serious place most of the time and I enjoyed going through your page, seeing all the little jokes and details throughout it. I should do more of that, to be honest.
(also, I Hate what Wiki is doing to my signature right now. sorry for the eye pain.) > Cellina Starfire: talk? 20:14, 21 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

that cat has caused me more pain than bills have caused me to be broke
thanks
not sure what the eye pain in question is supposed to be though, at least on dark mode cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 03:58, 22 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
I guess the blank code block takes on the color of the background - in light mode it's terrible. It's fixed now, though.
(I didn't even consider that Wikipedia had a dark mode... maybe I should try that. I'm used to default light mode, haha.) > Cellina Starfire: talk? 04:14, 22 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Zelda CD-i Plot Summaries edit

I know this is a very late response to your edit in the Zelda CD-i games, but I wanted to say that the reason why parts of the plot were edited out because they are unnecessary and actually go over the 400-700 word limit. Anyway, I'm just saying that and hope you are doing fine. 🤗 2603:6010:8B00:44FF:E8E0:71B0:B229:3157 (talk) 18:25, 22 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

will argue against that first part. the dinner blaster guy taking the triforce of courage was a decently-sized deal
the limit seems fair though, so that should probably be handled a bit better sometime
no idea if it'd be 700 words total or per game though cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 18:43, 22 April 2024 (UTC)Reply