testing 1,2,3Clown prince of serendip (talk) 15:02, 30 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

MfD nomination of User:Clown prince of serendip/Master in Saptial Development and analysis

edit

User:Clown prince of serendip/Master in Saptial Development and analysis, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Clown prince of serendip/Master in Saptial Development and analysis and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Clown prince of serendip/Master in Saptial Development and analysis during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Kumioko (talk) 23:14, 25 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

MfD nomination of User:Clown prince of serendip/Master in Saptial Development and analysis

edit

User:Clown prince of serendip/Master in Saptial Development and analysis, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Clown prince of serendip/Master in Saptial Development and analysis (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Clown prince of serendip/Master in Saptial Development and analysis during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Kumioko (talk) 23:14, 25 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

MfD nomination of User:Clown prince of serendip/Silk industy in Connecticut

edit

User:Clown prince of serendip/Silk industy in Connecticut, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Clown prince of serendip/Silk industy in Connecticut and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Clown prince of serendip/Silk industy in Connecticut during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Kumioko (talk) 23:15, 25 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

MfD nomination of User:Clown prince of serendip/MASDA 2009 - 2010

edit

User:Clown prince of serendip/MASDA 2009 - 2010, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Clown prince of serendip/MASDA 2009 - 2010 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Clown prince of serendip/MASDA 2009 - 2010 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Kumioko (talk) 23:18, 25 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Internal Audit Department, Luxembourg for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Internal Audit Department, Luxembourg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Internal Audit Department, Luxembourg until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 14:15, 6 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of BTS Luxembourg

edit
 

The article BTS Luxembourg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While I appreciate Melcous made an effort 13 months ago to tone down the promotional material, the article appears to be acting as a soapbox for BTS Luxembourg. Furthermore, source searches indicate this program doesn't meet the general notability guideline due to a lack of significant coverage in independent, reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SITH (talk) 16:53, 8 February 2019 (UTC)Reply