CiteLeadBoat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
They said u have blocked because accused of socketpuppet and as the report says that I reverted some changes in Beach road Visakhapatnam with google maps as the source and next editor says there said is no official govt source to be cited so I leave it as before and now know they are accused me that u are socket puppet that u edits are same as before user in some pages. Please review and unblock my account. Thanks, CiteLeadBoat (talk) 04:30, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You have explained why you are blocked, which we already knew, but you have not told us why you should be unblocked. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:15, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
@Boing! said Zebedee: Because that is the reason they mentioned on the talk page and I don't know why they blocked me and now I cant have the pencil button to edit which shows a keylock icon on that. I revert some unknown IP users edits and name users with no proper explanation given while if they have added sources and cited according to related content and I leave them as before. But if they are removing the content again and again with no definite reasons mentioned and myself search for sources on the internet and add a citation to the content and also if needed I move the content to the proper section. so they can't remove the content once again on that page because a reliable source existed. And I follow this method on every page. So pls review this and unblock me. thanks CiteLeadBoat (talk) 19:57, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- You are blocked for sockpuppetry, which means the misuse of multiple accounts. It is as a result of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Invisibelibrarian/Archive. If you wish to be unblocked, you will need make a new unblock request and address that. If you accept you have misused multiple accounts, explain why and what you will do differently if unblocked. And if you have not misused multiple accounts, explain why your editing behaviour makes it appear that you have. Put this in a new unblock request, and someone else will review it. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:25, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
CiteLeadBoat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am not a socket puppet and I revert some unknown IP users edits and name users with no proper explanation given while if they have added sources and cited according to related content and I leave them as before. But if they are removing the content again and again with no definite reasons mentioned and myself search for sources on the internet and add a citation to the content and also if needed I move the content to the proper section. so they can't remove the content once again on that page because a reliable source existed. And I follow this method on every page and I look for history section anything has been removed before with some silly reasons and I change back things if needed and worthy so the previous editor's good work will be saved. so this reason u may think I am a socket puppy with some other users and this blocks me. once again review me and unblock my account. And as a new user, I was layman, and sure I follow the rules of Wikipedia in future editing. Thanks, CiteLeadBoat (talk) 9:38 am, 14 August 2020, last Friday (3 days ago) (UTC−4)
Decline reason:
Based on the findings at the sockpuppet investigation and based on your editing histories and writing styles, you definitely appear to be the same user. You'll need to request an unblock at your original user page. only (talk) 16:07, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Your contributions to N. Chandrababu Naidu related articles
edit
Suggestion: Going through your edits, I've seen your interest in N. Chandrababu Naidu related articles. Some of your edits are non-constructive but not all, your editing style looks good for me. Given unblock request and sock-puppet investigation, if you're a Sockpuppet of User:Invisibelibrarian as accused its a stale cause a check-user can go through the editing style & IPs used from the creation of this account. Accepting a mistake (if made) can let us help you in editing Wikipedia. If not, there has to be a good reason to prove why the editing style of the accused sock perfectly matched. In either cases, if you're good to go inline with Wikipedia's rules, we're here to help you. You might be interested in Good articles & Featured articles rather than only adding content to subject's articles. Considering your good will, an admin can unblock you. We wikipedians are not interested in loosing a user with great potent, please choose wisely. 
Thank you. iMahesh (talk) 09:43, 15 August 2020 (UTC)