Cisnedenieve

Disruption

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia.

You have been told several times to stop your repeated Google question at the Teahhouse. Please stop.

RudolfRed (talk) 01:34, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

I have human rights on Internet, you are abusing my human rights. You can be accused, if someone see this, tell this to the Human Rights on internet. Cisnedenieve (talk) 01:38, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

You have no "right" to be disruptive on Wikipedia. You have posted the same question multiple times, and you are ignoring the answers you have been given. If you are not here to build an encyclopedia, then you are heading for your account being blocked. Consider this a final warning.

If you have a question about Wikipedia, then ask it. You are asking a question about Google, and this is the wrong place, even though you have been directed to the only source of an answer, which is here: https://about.google/intl/en_in/contact-google/

If you are concerned about some content on Wikipedia, identify that content and explain what is wrong. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:21, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

April 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Cullen328 (talk) 05:29, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

You have no free speech rights on this privately owned website. Cullen328 (talk) 05:57, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Good evening. I have human rights and freedom of speech on internet. And privacy is must be with human rights and freedom of speech, privacy is to practice the Law. Cisnedenieve (talk) 23:57, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

I am asking being unblocked because I did not repeat my question, If you re-read it, I used different words and it is not the same because are not the same words in the sentences, it looks like but it is not, there are English teachers who understand language because it is like Human Rights, language and Human Rights are also on internet and the right to privacy is to respect language and Human Rights. I am just a poor lady asking for help, I was not disruptive, I was just asking help and there were people who answered my question and I am very thankful

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cisnedenieve (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am asking being unblocked because I did not repeat my question, If you re-read it, I used different words and it is not the same because are not the same words in the sentences, it looks like but it is not, there are English teachers who understand language because it is like Human Rights, language and Human Rights are also on internet and the right to privacy is to respect language and Human Rights. I am just a poor lady asking for help, I was not disruptive, I was just asking help and there were people who answered my question and I am very thankful. Freedom of Speech is for everyone in every place, you have to see the Law, because the right to Freedom of speech it is not for one second in some places, it is all the time in all places. Privacy have to respect this Human Right in internet because internet is part of the world. You have to understand this and not force me because you are upset. I was asking for help, I demonstrated you that and you did not understand it. Fredoom of Speech it is not only for public places, it is also for private places also on Internet. I am clear of everything, you need to read the Law and apply The Law. You are abusing my Human Rights. And I did not repeat the question as you said, and you did not even say something about this and this was your argument, so I was not disruptive because I was asking for help and I did not repeat the question. So, your argument it is not lawful. And the right to privacy must be with the Law, it cannot be against Law. I need to be "judge" not for those who are personally against me, but for someone who really understand it. The Article 19 of Human Rights literally say: "Article 19: Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers". Privacy it is not to do whatever you want and I was asking for help and you are suppoused to help me not to block me. Why you did not mention the people who answered my questions politely? Cisnedenieve (talk) 00:28, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You need to read WP:FREESPEECH. You have no rights on this privately operated website. Free speech means that your government will not jail or punish you for your speech, it does not mean you can force private entities to host your views or comments. I could not enter your residence against your will and force you to hear my views on a topic. The same applies here. To be unblocked you will need to demonstrate your understanding of this principle and tell us what contributions you want to make to building this encyclopedia. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 08:15, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Cisnedenieve (talk)