Welcome!

Hello, Cindyinmaine, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Halloweenight, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! hydrox (talk) 01:27, 6 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Halloweenight

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Halloweenight requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. hydrox (talk) 01:27, 6 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Your edits to Feeders (film)

edit

I removed the link to IMDb (not a reliable source) and the "citation" sourced to the company's own website (again, not a reliable source). I also removed the link to Rotten Tomatoes, where the film had only received one (1) review; and of course the link to an online vendor's website. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:34, 6 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Articles for deletion nomination of Feeders (film)

edit

I have nominated Feeders (film), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feeders (film). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Orange Mike | Talk 05:01, 7 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Articles for deletion nomination of Halloweenight

edit

I have nominated Halloweenight, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Halloweenight. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Orange Mike | Talk 02:30, 10 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of The House That Screamed (2000 film)

edit
 

The article The House That Screamed (2000 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, the stub review cited is for the sequel

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 14:15, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Dweller (film)

edit
 

The article Dweller (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG. No non-trivial information from reliable sources (i.e. not IMDb or blogs) about the film seems to exist online, including on Google Books or Newspapers.com. I've only been able to find one mention of the film in a reliable source (this very minor/trivial one in an image caption in a local newspaper).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Matthew  / (talk) 21:10, 13 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Polonia brothers for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Polonia brothers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polonia brothers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Di (they-them) (talk) 16:41, 26 December 2023 (UTC)Reply