Christina Silverman

Please don't revert the article Menage a 3, as it is obvious you have not read the comic strip. Gary is indeed prone to nosebleeds and amnesia when seeing T and A, and this forms a significant portion of the comedy in that comic strip. If you're not sure whether something is vandalism or not, bring it up on the talk page, please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nmatavka (talk • contribs) 21:27, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Honestly, that page appears to meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion as it is completely unreferenced and does not establish notability. Christina Silverman (talk) 21:32, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

It's unreferenced because it's new, I've only been working on it for a few minutes. Why don't you provide a few minutes to actually be proactive and establish notability? --Nmatavka (talk) 21:51, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Go for it. I'm sorry I was so quick to revert. Christina Silverman (talk) 21:56, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

It would be best to not edit my post in the spirit of constructivness as it may result in your loss of moderation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.101.104.182 (talk) 02:27, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

You mean this edit [1]? It wasn't constructive at all and borders on vandalism. If you have a problem with how the article is written however, you're welcome to bring up the issue at the talk page. If you have any questions, I'll be glad to help you. Christina Silverman (talk) 02:36, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Reply for user warning

You may need to reconsider your revert (see here). These were all old accounts or doppelgangers of mine prior to requesting a username change. I am simply requesting deletions for right to vanish purposes. Please review carefully about how you revert in the future. Thank you. - nh.jg (talk) 18:46, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Fair enough, I've fixed it. Christina Silverman (talk) 18:48, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

3RR warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ménage à 3. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Carl Johnson)} 21:31, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

August 2010

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Emir Spahić: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit was inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. GorillaWarfare ^talk 22:00, 3 August 2010 (UTC) Hello Christina- This is Cameron Casey- I have been directing films, TV and Music Videos since 1990 all over the world- I've directed over 400 music videos and commercials, TV programs such as Zanes Chronicles for HBO- I just finished directing a feature film called BUDZ HOUSE. Please see my bio and resume on linkedin. Can you please re-establish my account on wikipedia. Thank you so much. You can google my name and reference thousands of pages about my work.

In what way was my edit to the 1985 snooker world championship article "unconstructive"? I explained clearly how my changes improved the wording of the article, yet you still undid them. What's your beef? 89.100.158.176 (talk) 22:23, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Tutor Program

Hi My name is Mario Andres, I'm looking for a tutor for my english for business class, I study at TEc de monterrey in Mexico City, so I'd like to know if you can adopt me. Marioandres-18 (talk) 18:22, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Template talk:FC Barcelona Bàsquet

can fix it? I don't know how. thank you :) Botend (talk) 10:47, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

A cheeseburger for you!

the cheese burger represents the amount of brain power you have you stupid bitch Xboxlover114 (talk) 22:25, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

"420" collaboration

As a member of WikiProject Cannabis, you are invited to help organize the project's upcoming "420" collaboration, which is scheduled for April 2017. Yes, we're a few months away, but we're hoping to get the ball rolling by getting buy-in from experienced Wikipedia editors and seek help fleshing out some goals and ideas for a successful campaign. We also plan to conduct both on-wiki and offlline outreach so non-Wikipedias can also contribute. If you are interested in participating, please sign up and contribute to the ongoing discussions. All editors are welcome! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 16:49, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!