Help

edit

{{helpme}} I read somewhere that you can move pages if you've been a user for 4 or more days. But, I've been a user for 10 days and I can't move pages! Why is this? --Baby G. (talk to me) 01:43, 4 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi Baby G. Two conditions need to be filled, as far as I know: 1) user for four days, 2) ten edits (I think this means ten edits to mainspace, but I'm not sure). I hope that helps. What articles are you trying to move? Prince of Canada t | c 01:46, 4 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
There aren't any specific pages I was trying to move, but no pages that I visited had the "move" tab at the top and I was wondering why. --Baby G. (talk to me) 01:49, 4 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
Ah. Well, that should change. Cheers. Prince of Canada t | c 01:57, 4 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Request for Rollback

edit

I'm sorry, but with just 22 edits I don't have enough to go on. Suggest use of WP:UNDO for the while. Again, apologies but we do need to see some experience before granting a relatively powerful tool that can cause upset if used incorrectly. Not a personal comment just that we need a bit more "evidence" as it were. Give it a week or so using that and hit me up on my talk page and I'll reconsider. Pedro :  Chat  20:35, 7 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

It's okay. I understand. --Baby G. (talk to me) 20:37, 7 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Your rollback request

edit

Hi! I regret that I must inform you that your request for the rollback permission has been denied. You can discover why by checking the archives at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Denied/October 2008#Baby G. SoxBot X (talk) 21:00, 7 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

I already knew. --Baby G. (talk to me) 21:10, 7 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
Just got to love that bot! Sorry, it's just I prefer to personally advise rather than let a machine do it! As said, use UNDO and we can look again in a little while. I'll be happy to review for you. Pedro :  Chat  22:04, 7 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

January 2009

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from File:TrickyStewart.jpg, without supplying the needed information. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's [[Talk:File:TrickyStewart.jpg|talk page]]. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. There is no source listed nor is there any author listed. As you are not the user who uploaded the image you still may be able to help.

Be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the image meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the images information page that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the image does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Soundvisions1 (talk) 03:26, 24 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

The file's licensing is GFDL-self. Isn't that source information? Chocolate Bar 03:33, 24 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
Depending on what information is supplied and what the image is. For example File:CBM-July08-cover.jpg is also licensed as {{self}} with {{cc-by-3.0}} however it is unlikely the uploader is the copyright holder or the author/publisher. File:Cal Henderson.jpg says it is self made, says the author is the uploader and uses {{GFDL-self}}. In this case it does appear it is self made and there are no issues. File:Cal bears football coach jeff tedford.jpg shows the source as http://www.mybearterritory.com however there is no indication on the website that the images on it are {{GFDL}} or {{cc-by-3.0}}. The only reason I did not tag this as a {{db-copyvio}} is because the uploader claims they are the owner of the website, in which case they need to submit permission. The image in question, that you have removed the {{di-no source}} tags from two times now, is lacking any source or author information. Based on the users other uploads, which all come from various sources and are all uploaded via {{self}}, it is not possible to assert who may be the author or the source thusly one needs to be provided. Soundvisions1 (talk) 04:03, 24 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Re: File:F73098cxuox.jpg

edit
 
Hello, Chocolate Bar. You have new messages at East718's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Coraline

edit

Because Coraline just redirected to Coraline (novella), the parentheses were not needed.--Cúchullain t/c 02:40, 25 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

But there are other works called "Coraline". Chocolate Bar 02:44, 26 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

98E/XxJoshuaxX

edit

I have heard rumors that you are yet another sockpuppet of 98E, also known as XxJoshuaxX, is this true? Live and Die 4 Hip Hop (talk) 22:59, 26 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

No. Chocolate Bar 23:37, 26 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
Based on this message and obvious editing similarities, you've been blocked as a clear sockpuppet. Spellcast (talk) 09:44, 31 May 2009 (UTC)Reply