Cheezyp00fz

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 00:57, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Evolution (2001 film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:16, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at My Life as a Teenage Robot, you may be blocked from editing. I mean, if the information is correct, surely you can find a report in something like a reputable news website? Thanks, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 03:36, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Wild Kratts. Please see WP:KIDSTVDATES. If you continue to add unsourced material, you will be blocked from editing.

If you disagree or do not understand, please discuss the issues here or on article talk pages before continuing. SummerPhD^v2.0 20:07, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

July 2020

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:51, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked to stop you from adding unsourced content and falsified citations, as you did here. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:54, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

July 2020

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. El_C 07:24, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Distributor field

Please do not fill in this field for network or cable sports and news programming. The field is there mainly for syndicated or first-run syndication content, not for insular news and sports programming where it is self-evident that ABC News programming won't be distributed to a CW or NBC affiliate. Nate • (chatter) 01:26, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Let's restate this simply; if a network produces a program to air on their network, we don't fill in the distributor field, because they're distributing it to themselves. Stop adding it to these articles. Nate • (chatter) 01:03, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

A little further advice...

The term vanity label has a very loaded meaning as something light and frothy, and being something that shouldn't be taken seriously. So this edit, involving an artist who doesn't meet the letter of the definition, comes off as an insult to his music rather than any sort of fact. The edit has been reverted. Take your edit warnings seriously. Nate • (chatter) 20:24, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

November 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Family Guy, you may be blocked from editing. You've already been warned about this 'Distributor' field nonsense, and you're not even doing it right as you're suppose to list the original company, not what it's called now. Keep this up, and it likely you will get reported for it. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 00:06, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)