Charon77
Re: A Cookie for you edit
All is forgiven, Charon! Happy editing. Christianster94 (talk) 16:33, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for patrolling new pages; it's an important task. At present, there are just too few vandalism reverts in your contribution history for me to be happy handing over the rollback tool - those that are there look fine, but we usually expect to see >50 anti-vandal reverts before rollback is granted. Clock up another 30-40 and reapply; if you continue in your current vein I'd have no problem giving you rollback then. You might also want to consider using Twinkle (which has a sort of faux-rollback incorporated within it). Yunshui 雲水 07:49, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 29 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fast approximate anti-aliasing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anti-aliasing (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
Capitalization of verbs in titles of creative works edit
I've had to revert a couple of your recent edits to My Little Pony articles. According to Wikipedia's Manual of Style, specifically MOS:CT, verbs are written with an uppercase initial letter in titles of creative works. Favonian (talk) 10:25, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
Phone Repairs Plus edit
Hello, in response to your query about "Phone Repairs Plus," if you look under the history tab of the article you will see it was submitted for review by user 118.208.243.236 on 28 September 2012 at 13:22 hrs and was located in the Category: Pending AfC submission area. As to why it was declined, Facebook and the company's own sites are not independent, reliable sources nor does the company appear to meet the WP:CORP notability criteria for a wikipedia article about a corporation. Since Wikipedia is not a web hosting site nor a business directly, this article ran afoul of the prohibition against advertising contained in the help file "What Wikipedia is Not." Thanks for your inquiry and interest. Best Regards, --Snowysusan (talk) 16:34, 3 October 2012 (UTC)