In response to your feedback edit

The claim you added was not about Emergency contraception - it was about hormonal contraception generally. Please read WP:SYNTH. I'd advise starting a discussion on the talk page of the article (see Talk:Emergency contraception) about the relevance of your addition if you'd like to pursue it, but I think you may be fighting a losing battle.

Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:27, 17 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

 


  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Emergency contraception. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. LyrlTalk C 02:45, 19 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.