In response to your feedback

edit

Wow, that doesn't seem good. If this happens again, try discussing the matter over in the article's talk page. If that doesn't work, find an admin to help you. If you need other help editing, please try Help desk and the help pages. Hope you have a great time here!

Vincent Liu (something to say?) 07:16, 2 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

Welcome!

edit

Hello, Celomuca, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Dan56 (talk) 17:07, 9 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Regarding Just Be Free

edit

It is not an official album of her's. The chronology lists her official releases, this is a demo album released without consent and nor her record label or herself gave permission for it to be released and therefore making it an unofficial product of Christina Aguilera. See Pre-Madonna it was released under entirely the same circumstances and it is not featured in her chronology because it is not regarded as a Madonna album. I researched and developed this article into GA and I definitely know that it is not an official album! Thank you -FeuDeJoie (talk) 20:09, 14 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Unblock

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Celomuca (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I crated an account on the same computer as my fellow sibling, becuase i like editing and improving pages!, i have nothing to do with this!!

Decline reason:

Please see WP:BROTHER for why we generally don't accept such statements. If it's true that your sibling is the one who has been misbehaving then they really owe you a big apology, because they basically ruined any chance you had of participating here, since we have no way of verifying your story. -- Atama 16:59, 22 August 2012 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Celomuca (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

??? this hasn nothing to do with my sibling, the reason WHY i was blocked is becuase of multi acounct, but the reason is because we share the same computer!, i think its very unfair of wikipedia, how do yo supposed to have account if you share? cant you delete the mathiassandell account? or something...this is unfair :(

Decline reason:

You created this account the day after your sibling (???) was blocked for the first time, and the article which you have edited have been, broadly speaking, the same ones that he did. I concede the possibility (although not the likelihood) that you are both using the same computer to edit about the same things, but on balance WP:BROTHER clearly applies, and an unblock is not appropriate. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 19:31, 22 August 2012 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Celomuca (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Am i gona be blocked forever, how can i be unblocked then?

Decline reason:

To be unblocked, you should request an unblock from your original account and convince us that the behaviour that led you to this block will not be repeated. Max Semenik (talk) 09:32, 23 August 2012 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Orphaned non-free image File:Paloma Faith 30MLA.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Paloma Faith 30MLA.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 15:08, 4 October 2015 (UTC)Reply