Ceesboogaart
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Eriba-Marduk
btw 2072018 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Eriba-Marduk This account is a sock puppet of Asharidu (talk · contribs · logs), and it has been blocked indefinitely.
answer me: Cees Boogaart Vandalism only by rustrolls from From May 22 , 2008 till June 5, 2015! it was here then according to their contribs..only rustrolls tried to change it see my remarks.
I know you're not from Babylon and see a growing trend to make Wikipedia into Russiapedia.
On Tsardom of Russia besides a lot of pro-russia sources I can't find not independent sources..
Btw while there was Muscovy, there never was, is , and will be a country named "russia"
My proof:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qSn_0tBD_lE history channel ivan the terrible no mention of tsardom Ivan Moscow, it is just called Muscovy & Muscovites
Map of Poland and Hungary by Sebastian Munster, 1550. The map shows “Russia” for Ukraine, “Russia Alba” for Belarus, while the Moscow Princedom is called “Moscovia.” (karty.by) http://www.karty.by/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Sebastian-Munster_Poloniae-Et-Ungariae-Nova-Descriptio1550.jpg http://www.karty.by/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Sebastian-Munster_1552_basel_Nouvelle-description-de-Poloigne-Hongri.jpg color
1723 Ukraine and Moscovia on same map http://www.karty.by/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/x-moskovie_1723.jpg Polish & russian Ukraine and Moskovia 1723 http://www.karty.by/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/moskovai.Herman-Moll-1723.jpg
http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/4076
Hakluyt, Richard, 1552?-1616
Title The Discovery of Muscovy
Language English
LoC Class DK: History: General and Eastern Hemisphere: Russia, Former Soviet Republics, Poland
Subject Willoughby, Hugh, Sir, d. 1554
Subject Chancellor, Richard, d. 1556
http://euromaidanpress.com/2014/05/14/how-moscow-hijacked-the-history-of-kyivan-rus/
was changed to
The Grand Duchy of Moscow, changed to the Tsardom of Russia by Tsar Ivan IV in 1547.
WHICH IS NOT TRUE
was renamed not from muscovy to tsardom of russia in 1547 but was done in 1721 and renamed THEN from muscovy to russia.
http://gumilevica.kulichki.net/VGV/index.html(russian) http://gumilevica.kulichki.net/VGV/vgv5.htm muscovy(russian) from last III Ivan IV was crowned king in the Assumption Cathedral 16 January 1547 coronation ritual was similar to what took place at the coronation of the grandson of Ivan III Dmitry in 1496 were, however, some differences. Although the term "kingdom" was frequently mentioned during the coronation of Dmitry, he was crowned the Grand Duke. Ivan IV was formally crowned king of Metropolitan Macarius. ........ (of muscovy)[65] so NOT tsar...or tsardom in 1547
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muscovy_%28disambiguation%29
A year ago I posted to this wiki article a redditpage
https://www.reddit.com/r/russiawarinukraine/comments/37tryg/muscovy_the_name_of_the_grand_duchy_of_moscow/
and while on there was From May 22 , 2008 till June 5, 2015! https://web.archive.org/web/20150515000000*/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muscovy_%28disambiguation%29
The name of the Grand Duchy of Moscow, changed for Russia by Tsar Peter I in the early 18th century. The goal of this change was to establish a connection between Muscovy and medieval state of Kievan Rus', thus claiming the right of Moscow to possess all the lands of Rus'. Muscovy was officially renamed by Russian imperial decree in 1721. The ethnonym "Russian" was fixed later - only at the end of the century, when Empress Catherine II of "the highest command" Moscow ordered the people called "Russian people" and forbade them to use the title of "Muscovites".
then the trouble begun.
And according their contribs most were pro-russia contributors trying to
rewrite - falsify history
as you can see on the reddit page I have more then enough material to proof, while you and others haven't.
Kremlin trollfactory st.petersburg 55 Savushkina Street , there trolls not only are paid to roam and interfere in social media, they also are paid to falsify wikipedia which certainly in regard to history of former soviet-union countries and "russia" is not factual anymore, now i'm blocked on wikipedia in a battle with rustrolls trying to protect 1 page, neither adminstrators or top wikipedia care about falisfying or factual entries it seems, just my "editwarrying" see story (at top) on https://www.reddit.com/r/russiawarinukraine/comments/37tryg/muscovy_the_name_of_the_grand_duchy_of_moscow/ and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Trolls_from_Olgino and on this talk page
Also mailed Oshwah ~Oshwah~(talk) and wikipedia.org
Boing! said Zebedee spasiba :-) I understand why I was blocked cause I, on my own, can't compete with more then 1 who try to falysify facts in Wikipedia, and thus I violated 3Rrule.
November 2016
edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:47, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Ceesboogaart (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I tried to prevent Wikpipedia becoming RUSSIPEDIA, wikipedia concerning facts on former soviet union countries is since 2014 NOT FACTUAL anymore, looks more kremlinmedia Ceesboogaart (talk) 19:23, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
December 2016
edit
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:Muscovy (disambiguation), you may be blocked from editing. Not only have you been using talk pages as a soapbox, you are leaving a trail of WP:PERSONAL attacks directed at experienced, respected Wikipedians in your wake (and I'm not including myself in the equation, despite your attack on me). Such behaviour is WP:NOTHERE, as has been made abundantly clear by a number of editors. One more 'contribution' of such an ilk and I will initiate a WP:ANI against you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 21:30, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Everyone is entitled to his/her own opinion, but not his/her own facts. https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Daniel_Patrick_Moynihan Ceesboogaart (talk) 21:41, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
- Please do not edit someone else's comment - I have restored it now. You can remove comments from your talk page here, but you must not change or just remove portions of them. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 21:48, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
- I should add that yes, everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but Wikipedia talk pages are not appropriate places for you to offer them to us - please do read WP:SOAPBOX as someone has already suggested. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 21:49, 8 December 2016 (UTC)