Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to TuxWordSmith, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. QU TalkQu 16:42, 18 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of TuxMathScrabble for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article TuxMathScrabble is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TuxMathScrabble until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Zanhe (talk) 21:10, 30 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of TuxWordSmith for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article TuxWordSmith is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TuxWordSmith until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Zanhe (talk) 21:11, 30 October 2019 (UTC)Reply