CaptainStarbucks

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Eric1985 (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

nonsense. we are not even in the same time zone.CaptainStarbucks (talk) 16:38, 31 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

August 2010

Latest comment: 14 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for sock puppetry or meat puppetry. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 16:41, 31 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

This is outrageous. I like Eric's blog. but I am not Eric.CaptainStarbucks (talk) 16:48, 31 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

And, just for the record, you just blocked all editing from Starbucks. guess I'll have to find another coffee shop. It's easy to do, you know. and it's one of the reasons why blocks are silly. There are many coffee shops in the world.CaptainStarbucks (talk) 16:48, 31 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Statement: Wikibias is a website. It exists because Wikipedia pretends to be a reliable reference source, but on the subject of Israel and a number of other topics, a clear editorial bias exists enforced in large part by banning or topic banning editors who attempt to add reliable information. Go to the site. read the posts. Tell me that blocking editors is the best way to keep articles on Israel reliable. I maintain that the best way is to let people on both sides edit. Not to block pro-Israel editors while clever editors use Wikipedia as a private, anti-Israel propaganda organ. CaptainStarbucks (talk) 16:48, 31 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CaptainStarbucks (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is a request that a sane editor take into account the fact that I am not Eric, and it is wrong to blame him for actions taken by readers of his blog, and reprimand the editor who made this block. It makes wikipedia look like a kangaroo court. Also note the absurdity of blocking editing from Starbucks. Think I'll head over to the Cafe at Barnes and Nobles and do some more editing. I am not asking to be unblocked. You cannot accomplish that. There are too many cafes in the world.

Decline reason:

Ignored, not an unblock request. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 17:11, 31 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note to reviewing admin: See Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive67#User:No More Mr Nice Guy and User:Jiujitsuguy and Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive634#Jiujitsuguy and Eric1985 blocked indefinitely for off-wiki canvassing regarding Israel/Palestine for more information about Eric1985's block. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 17:09, 31 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic