Candice Coppins

Hot30 Countdown

If you want to delete the redirect "Hot30 Countdown", just put {{db|housekeeping - typo}} at the beginning, and someone will delete it. Of if you think it's worth keeping, you don't have to. Thanks. --John Nagle 15:42, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

CCM

CCM may refer to a light pop style of music but previously it was more ambiguous. When I was in high school, I could read reviews of punk groups or rock groups in CCM (magazine). In fact I see that the current CCM has a review of Kutless: "one of the top-selling hard rock bands in Christian music"[1]. Our CCM article follows this generic usage to describe the entire musical movement arising out of "Jesus music", gospel and hymn singing - and including all sorts of music styles from light pop to rap to metal but which are Christian and contemporary. See the bands mentioned in the article and in the List of CCM artists. Rmhermen 16:17, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Cross-posting from my talk page:

Regarding Hillsong, I think you need to investigate the old revolutionaries of the Jesus Music movement of the early 1970s. As for the three artists you mention: it seems to me, based on online soundclips, Bethany Dillon would be billed as pop or CCM (as our article does call her), Joy Williams would be billed as country or Christian country in the U.S. although a number of her chart positions are on Adult Contemporary, and our article on KJ-52 says he is a rap artist which Christianity Today review also calls him[2]. From your changes to the Christian pop article you seem to be making that into what the CCM article already covers. From that article: "Christian pop includes many Christian hip hop, Christian rap, Christian metal, Christian punk, Christian rock, and Christian worship music, it is reasonable to say that "Christian pop" is a loosely defined category. It may also be classified as Christian soft rock or Christian pop rock." I don't think this is a good definition. Rmhermen 17:14, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Talk pages

New comments go at the bottom of talk pages. Text can be

set of with a leading : or

• with a leading * which give slightly different results but both are in common use.
  • • Multiple indents use

multiple symbols. Rmhermen 16:17, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Christine_Caine.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Christine_Caine.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:53, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Christine Caine

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your creation of the article, Christine Caine, but we cannot accept copyrighted text borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Please see Wikipedia:Copyright problems for more information on this topic, or generally, Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines. Please do not remove the copyright violation notice placed in the article or repost the suspected infringing text. However, if you would like to rewrite the article in your own words, follow the link in the posted notice to create a temporary subpage. If your new article is appropriate, and not a further copyright violation, the reviewing administrator will move that new article into place once the copyright status of the original has been resolved. Happy editing! Sarah Ewart (Talk) 10:04, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Matt Crouch

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your creation of the article, Matt Crouch, but we cannot accept copyrighted text borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Please see Wikipedia:Copyright problems for more information on this topic, or generally, Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines. Please do not remove the copyright violation notice placed in the article or repost the suspected infringing text. However, if you would like to rewrite the article in your own words, follow the link in the posted notice to create a temporary subpage. If your new article is appropriate, and not a further copyright violation, the reviewing administrator will move that new article into place once the copyright status of the original has been resolved. Happy editing! Sarah Ewart (Talk) 13:39, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Candice, What are you talking about? This page is not up for deletion, or at least it does not seem to be, and it is not pirated. Juda S. Engelmayer 05:04, 23 December 2006 (UTC) (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Tiffany Dupont.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Tiffany Dupont.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jackofalltradesmasterofnone 13:21, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Influencers Conference

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Influencers Conference, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Tony Fox (arf!) 05:05, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Paradise Community Church.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Paradise Community Church.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:18, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Phil Dooley

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Phil Dooley requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ukexpat (talk) 16:47, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Christian pop culture for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christian pop culture is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian pop culture until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wasabi,the,one (talk) 13:20, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

I think the topic is notable and have !voted keep on the AfD debate. As the article creator, I'd advise you to comment on it as well. White Arabian Filly ^Neigh 20:52, 6 September 2016 (UTC)