Please do not remove AfD tags edit

But you are more than welcome to contribute to the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Killing of Brianna Ghey. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:36, 13 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

February 2023 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Killing of Brianna Ghey. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:37, 13 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Killing of Brianna Ghey, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:40, 13 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

I'm going to try another personalized warning here. Despite your personal feelings about the article, Wikipedia has processes we follow to determine if something is notable enough for an article. You are welcome to contribute constructively to the discussions, but if you remove tags, blank pages or make unconstructive attacks again I will block you. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:43, 13 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

I am tired of heartless wikipedians ignoring the humanity of things just because it’s policy. Canadian Owl (talk) 19:00, 13 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hey. I know how frustrating it is when an article gets nominated for deletion, particularly on a highly emotive subject such as this. Wikipedia's notability guidelines are labyrinthine at the best of times, with many differing opinions on what is or is not notable. It's frustrating to me as the creator that the article has been nominated for deletion so soon, despite the regular creation of killing articles particularly from the US.
There is a way through this though, that I think or hope will result in the article either being kept, or will result in a temporary move to the draft space while long term coverage of it develops. Come over to the article's talk page, and help me improve the article. Help search for sources covering this killing, and suggest text for how they can be worked into the article's prose. The more that we can build up this article, the more that we can demonstrate to the editors who don't understand why this is noteworthy, the greater the chance that it either gets kept or temporarily moved to the draft space. Sideswipe9th (talk) 19:15, 13 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. Canadian Owl (talk) 19:18, 13 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:DinoSoupCanada per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DinoSoupCanada. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 18:33, 20 March 2023 (UTC)Reply