Calzone-mike

November 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Storm Front (novel), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Storm Front (novel) was changed by Calzone-mike (u) (t) deleting 15477 characters on 2009-11-08T15:36:42+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 15:36, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Storm Front (novel), you will be blocked from editing. JForget 15:38, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Storm Front (novel). Nsaa (talk) 15:40, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. JForget 15:48, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Storm Front (novel) has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 14:38, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Storm Front (novel). Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 14:48, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

November 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Storm Front (novel), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Storm Front (novel) was changed by Calzone-mike (u) (t) deleting 8549 characters on 2009-11-17T21:33:28+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 21:33, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Storm Front (novel). If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 21:46, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of two weeks for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. — ξ^xplicit 21:59, 17 November 2009 (UTC)