Cacacio
October 2011
editHello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Avianca, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
- Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Avianca was changed by Cacacio (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.963467 on 2011-10-03T14:29:34+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:29, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Avianca. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Wikipelli Talk 14:31, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Avianca with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Wikipelli Talk 14:32, 3 October 2011 (UTC)