Bryantman5
Joined 12 January 2016
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Bryantman5 in topic Inflammatory language is used to describe Oath keepers and is not accurate. If Wikipedia is committed to accuracy then things like anti-govt and radical should not be used when referring to oath keepers. I think someone should investigate and see that...
January 2016
edit
Hello, I'm MrX. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Oath Keepers without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. - MrX 03:29, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Inflammatory language is used to describe Oath keepers and is not accurate. If Wikipedia is committed to accuracy then things like anti-govt and radical should not be used when referring to oath keepers. I think someone should investigate and see that...
editSome removed items were accidental Bryantman5 (talk) 03:38, 12 January 2016 (UTC)