Brl2000

Welcome!

Hello, Brl2000, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Rivers Cuomo did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Introduction tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome.  wizzito | say hello! 01:12, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Help me!

Please help me with...

First, I would like to thank user talk:Wizzito for their time and effort in reviewing my edits to Rivers Cuomo. I am not quite clear what trouble or issues they are dealing with, but I sincerely appreciate the time and effort invested in helping to maintain quality and improve content in a constructive manner. Whatever happened, know that some of us out here care and genuinely appreciate those that invest in such an important and vital community project.

With regards to the specifics of the feedback received, I am not sure if it applies in this situation. One of the links I provided was to a video, originally recorded and live-streamed, of the subject themself (themselves?) discussing the substance of the changes I made to the page. I thought it was interesting and amusing, and even endearing, and thought it would be something others would find notable. This was a change made in good faith and good humor, as is this follow up seeking clarification. My question here is whether the live interview link provided is sufficient evidence of the changes I made. I can appreciate why links to the github profile on its own would not be considered authoritative, since that could be faked by anybody, but I guess I thought the interview would be sufficient.

This is something I would greatly appreciate clarification on, to help ensure any future contributions I make are properly supported.

Doh! Sorry, forgot to sign!

Brl2000 (talk) 19:51, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Deep thanks to all who work to improve on this critical platform and community. Brl2000 (talk) 19:50, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi, I'm going to move this to the article talk page, it seems a better place for it - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 11:29, 21 April 2022 (UTC)