User talk:Briguy9876/Roblox/Archive

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Gordonrox24 in topic Re-wrote Article

This is User:Briguy9876's Talk page Archive. Do not make changes. Thanks!--Briguy9876 (talk) 12:55, 13 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Sources Borked edit

The sources should not direct to the actual user and items, but an article, if possible. Not many people can see that the certain user is 200,000th. Also, the article seems like an advert. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.231.183.25 (talk) 02:19, 31 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Then what would be your opinion on how to NOT make it sound like an advertisement? --Briguy9876 (talk) 18:37, 31 March 2009 (UTC)Reply


If you had read the previous discussion, you would find we have already discussed that. A talk page is for either consensus vote or constructive feedback. If you don't have either, why edit?--gordonrox24 (talk) 21:27, 31 March 2009 (UTC)Reply
Ia "Borked" even a real word? I don't think so.--gordonrox24 (talk) 22:19, 2 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for remaking edit

Hey Briguy nice that your remaking the Roblox article this will really help everybody find it plus even though Im not flaming blockland but why should they get an article and ROBLOX which is about 5 times as big barely get any 3rd party forces and blockland gets an award--15avaughn (talk) 02:11, 21 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Blockland was first. They got the word out and they got known. --Briguy9876 (talk) 21:57, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

hmm i though roblox was 06 and block was 07 =/ roblox user: kirbysuperstar223 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.168.56.2 (talk) 23:16, 6 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image edit

I removed the image. Don't want to have them remove the whole article becuase of a simple logo.--Gordonrox24 (talk) 17:03, 8 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

I had a User donate an Image to me. Hopefully that is ok.--Gordonrox24 (talk) 22:15, 8 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

References edit

All of the old references are back up. They are not in the Ref list yet.--Gordonrox24 (talk) 00:59, 24 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Construction Tag edit

Added the construction tag. Don't know why. We probably should of had that on the original roblox page.--gordonrox24 (talk) 01:16, 22 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Administrator note edit

I contacted the admin who previously deleted the Roblox page. He had this to say.

":Hi. I think the references are now good enough for notability. What I advise you to do is format all references as inline references (in appropriate places) using the {{cite news}} template and remove external links from the body text (they should be in footnoted references where necessary). You can also lose the NYT link, because it only mentions Roblox once, briefly. Then you should submit your draft to WP:DRV, asking for community permission for its restoration.

Note that I deleted File:ROBLOX Screen.jpg from Commons because as a screenshot of a copyrighted game it was itself a copyrighted derivative work."


Sounds good to me!--gordonrox24 (talk) 23:18, 22 March 2009 (UTC)Reply


Admins talk page found here.--gordonrox24 (talk) 23:20, 22 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Lua References. edit

I don't know. There are four references for the Lua and "build anything" section of the article. That is the only place I can think to put them.--gordonrox24 (talk) 23:36, 25 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Erm, try not to link to Roblox itself as a referance. It needs to be 3rd party, not 1st party. --Briguy9876 (talk) 18:01, 27 March 2009 (UTC)Reply


Do you mean for the 100K day hat and the 2,000,000 users links? I can remove them if you would like.--gordonrox24 (talk) 02:17, 29 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Re-wrote Article edit

I have re-written the article to improve it's organisation, place the references in more appropriate places and added extra information on character customisation and the economy. --User:Owen0202 April 12th —Preceding undated comment added 15:44, 12 April 2009 (UTC).Reply

Well, I re-wrote what you wrote because you didn't seem to show enough facts and too many opinions. If you aren't happy with it, I am maltesetiger in-game. -BlueXTiger —Preceding unsigned comment added by BlueXTiger (talkcontribs) 23:23, 16 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Im serious! Your way is very messed up! You messed up the whole article! Now I have to re-edit it the RIGHT way, AGAIN!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by BlueXTiger (talkcontribs) 01:43, 17 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

For Christ's sake, you put some references that people should and could care less about! And you also complained about my way! —Preceding unsigned comment added by BlueXTiger (talkcontribs) 01:52, 17 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

We have references, interwiki links, and straight facts. You removed references and placed your own info. You can add all the info you want but removing valuable references isn't constructive. If you are going to add info with no reference please add a {{fact}} tag so we know what we need sources for. Thanks--gordonrox24 (talk) 10:51, 17 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

All References. edit

A list of all the references used on this page. Ever.

--gordonrox24 (talk) 14:18, 24 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

New sections. edit

I like the addition of new sections, but we still need references to back them up.--gordonrox24 (talk) 15:43, 12 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, I realised I had a lack of 3rd party sources when I re-wrote the article. We are going to need to get looking for more to back it up. --Owen0202 (talk) 15:47, 12 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

I added some references from the see also section in apropriate places. --86.167.173.59 (talk) 16:30, 13 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Potential reference edit

What seems like a very reliable overiew of Roblox.

http://connollyshaun.blogspot.com/2008/08/social-web-example-roblox-virtual.html

--Owen0202 (talk) 15:58, 12 April 2009 (UTC)Reply


I have taken the source to the Reliable sources Noticeboard to verify.--gordonrox24 (talk) 16:10, 12 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Good, we could really do with that --Owen0202 (talk) 16:13, 12 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

I could have sworn that blogs were not allowed. I think we tried to use it in the original article. --Briguy9876 (talk) 00:28, 13 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
That is what I think too.--gordonrox24 (talk) 01:04, 13 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

The blog is a no. Youtube is a maybe if we can prove it reliable, which is almost impossible for an online game.--gordonrox24 (talk) 22:37, 14 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Un-cited Material. edit

All text with no references Will and can be removed if need be. With Wikipedia:Twinkle I can revert an article to any past edit at any time.--gordonrox24 (talk) 00:36, 13 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Well at the moment this isn't an article, it is a user page that is undergoing work. I don't think they will delete it yet.--Owen0202 (talk) 10:34, 13 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Not yet, but before I bring it back to WP:DRV It will have to be cleaned out. --gordonrox24 (talk) 12:47, 13 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Most of Blocklands references are videos, couldn't we do the same? --Owen0202 (talk) 14:48, 13 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Taken to WP:RSN as well.--gordonrox24 (talk) 21:02, 13 April 2009 (UTC

Take a look through WP:RS and WP:BLOGS--gordonrox24 (talk) 21:24, 13 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Online Multiplayer, Offline Editing edit

This could be misleading, because Roblox Studio cannot be opened if there is no Internet connection. But then again, editing a place is a one person thing. If you agree, edit it, and likewise. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ANormalUsername1 (talkcontribs)

Well, you could if you have internet but you can turn off internet. -Jeremjay24

18:44, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Advert. edit

The article looks good, but it is starting to read like an advertisement again. I'm going to try and fix that.--gordonrox24 (talk) 22:55, 29 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

I went through the article and tried to fix it.--gordonrox24 (talk) 00:26, 3 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Why I don't try to help to fix this page anymore edit

See, the problem is, oh so long ago when I first started on this project, I was a normal user trying to get this back.

NOW I am Moderator, so I could be considered part of the staff, and I might be yelled at for advertising or some other strange thing.

All I really do now is search for sources. Its really all I can do. --Briguy9876 (talk) 02:50, 8 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speaking of sources, how does this look? http://www.commonsensemedia.org/website-reviews/roblox.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by Briguy9876 (talkcontribs) 02:53, 8 May 2009 (UTC)Reply


It is WP policy. In theory; Staff of a company cannot contribute to an article while adhering to WP:NPOV. Not sure if you are considered staff, as you are really only a volunteer.--gordonrox24 (talk) 14:19, 16 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

I will find out about that references. Looks decent.--gordonrox24 (talk) 14:19, 16 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Added more info edit

I made grammar better and added the part where BC members have no ads. Jeremjay24 (talk) 01:41, 18 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. Still need to find sources for all of our info. I think the one you listed is ok briguy.--gordonrox24 (talk) 01:45, 18 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

I just fixed some typos and added more info. Jeremjay24 (talk) 02:09, 19 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

What else should I add in? Jeremjay24 (talk) 22:49, 18 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Is Shedletshy a game developer? Jeremjay24 (talk) 21:11, 19 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Pics edit

I found out that the article looked plain, and it is because the lack of pictures. I'm gonna put cool pictures up tomorrow. Jeremjay24 (talk) 02:34, 19 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

If you need help uploading the pictures, you can always e-mail it to the e-mail address posted on my user page. It is rather hard to do correctly as you have to put it in the right category.--gordonrox24 (talk) 20:36, 20 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

reference edit

the reference Briguy listed above has been added to the article. WP:IAR I am not going through the reliable sources noticeboard for this one.--gordonrox24 (talk) 14:17, 24 May 2009 (UTC)Reply


This? edit

Is this a good reference? http://parityx.org/eitw/?p=17 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeremjay24 (talkcontribs) 22:39, 25 May 2009 (UTC) Also, was roblox published in 2005? I was on "The Impossible Quiz". Jeremjay24 (talk) 02:01, 26 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hey, The reference won't work as it is a Blog. WP:BLOGS. I am not sure if it was 2004 or 2005. I have been trying to figure that out for a while. I am not sure where Jordan got his info while making that quiz. Maybe I can find out....--gordonrox24 (talk) 10:58, 26 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

CRAZY EDITS edit

I added info about badges and put more info from ResseMcBlox. I also got the exact release date. Jeremjay24 (talk) 20:39, 27 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

I am still trying to figure out where you are getting this date from...--gordonrox24 (talk) 01:11, 28 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

It was on a site that looks very trustable. Jeremjay24 (talk) 22:09, 28 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Update: The date is perfectly correct. I looked on Web Archive, which shows you info of sites in history. Jeremjay24 (talk) 00:51, 29 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Do you mind posting a link?--gordonrox24 (talk) 01:46, 29 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Sure. Go to web.archive.org. It'll show history of the page but it's an error. 2005 was when it was released. Jeremjay24 (talk) 19:36, 29 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
I am just not sure how much trust we can put into a web archive. I think the entries there are user submitted. There could be things from an earlier time that nobody has screen shots of.--gordonrox24 (talk) 21:59, 29 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
I understand. And I saw another site say it, too. I forgot the link. Leave it there as I PM Builderman. Jeremjay24 (talk) 22:06, 29 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Sounds good. I'm going to take a good look through the Wiki and find some old documents.--gordonrox24 (talk) 18:23, 30 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Perfect. Jeremjay24 (talk) 20:06, 30 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

History edit

I'm trying to create a history section. I'm gonna also put history on economy. Jeremjay24 (talk) 20:44, 31 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Cleanups and Sources edit

1. Should we put overview in the WAY WAY top? It wouuld ce cleaner.
2. Does roblox.com count as a reliable source? Jeremjay24 (talk) 20:03, 5 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Yeah I am going to move the table of contents to below the overview and I might put the Infobox in a new spot. the roblox website can't be used as a source though.--gordonrox24 (talk) 13:47, 6 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

There it is moved. If you give it a title the table of contents goes above it again, so that is why the title is gone.--gordonrox24 (talk) 14:00, 6 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Improvements. edit

I am kinda anxious to take the article back to WP:DRV but there are some issues that must be cleaned up first. WP:MOS is important. We need to proofread the article fixing grammar and wording. We also need to do a little advert cleaning as some of the wording we are using sounds promotional. Of course we always need new references. That has been an issue forever. Just a few things that need work. This is more of a note to self then anything else.--gordonrox24 (talk) 16:03, 6 June 2009 (UTC)Reply