Image copyright problem with Image:Sfdafgdsgf.png edit

 
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Sfdafgdsgf.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 18:36, 23 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Gwen Stefani edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Gwen Stefani. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 17Drew 20:48, 21 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image source problem with Image:0080883111492 500X500.jpg edit

 
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:0080883111492 500X500.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:45, 11 January 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. The Helpful One (Talk) (Contributions) (Review Me!) 19:45, 11 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image copyright problem with Image:0080883111492 500X500.jpg edit

 
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:0080883111492 500X500.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. The Helpful One (Talk) (Contributions) (Review Me!) 19:45, 11 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Brian Rivera edit

 

A tag has been placed on Brian Rivera, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Kingpin13 (talk) 20:27, 15 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Agustina Ramírez edit

Proposed deletion of Agustina Ramírez edit

 

The article Agustina Ramírez has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Cannot show notability, or even verify content. I tried to source for the BLP Rescue Project but couldn't find any viable sourcing.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Milowenttalkblp-r 13:16, 19 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Remesis (film) edit

 

The article Remesis (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable film with no coverage.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BOVINEBOY2008 13:20, 31 December 2011 (UTC)Reply