This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mean as custard (talk) 17:18, 19 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

February 2013

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Brendan Seven (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The airline changed it's name... years ago in fact. Just like Delta did to Huḟḟ Dạland Dusters back in the day.

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified sockpuppet of blocked user. --jpgordon::==( o ) 18:08, 19 February 2013 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Maybe the airline changed its name, but all the users that reverted your edits did so not because they deny your claims, but because you did not dicuss your changes (which involved deleting an entire article) in the proper place, i.e. the article's talk page.--Jetstreamer Talk 17:35, 19 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
He/she's trolling. United or Delta did not change their names. WP:DENY. Vacation9 17:36, 19 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
Maybe the linkage made by the user comes from the fact that it is said in Varney Air Lines that the airline merged into United Airlines, yet the claim has no inline citations. I'm not supporting the blocked user's claim, but trying to make him/her understand s(he) was blocked for not discussing the changes and, most important, for trying to evade a former block by the use of multiple accounts.--Jetstreamer Talk 17:44, 19 February 2013 (UTC)Reply