Br4011

Welcome!

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Br4011! I am Darth Mike and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

-- Darth Mike  (join the dark side) 05:18, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Unblock

{{unblock|I thought that br4011 Account is Cancelled then only i maked this Account. Very Sorry This will not happen any more. Please Give me br4011 or brajbilla2007 Account.}}

{{unblock-ip|1=124.43.40.244|2=Abusing [[WP:Sock puppetry|multiple accounts]]: [[User:Br4011]]|Amalthea}}

There is no autoblock on that IP, so you should be fine. — Amalthea 15:24, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Prashanth D.Misale

Hello
The article on Prashanth D.Misale has been deleted fifteen minutes before you recreated it, following a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prashanth Misale.
Please do not recreate articles that have been deleted following a deletion discussion. If you can find reliable sources to alleviate the concerns from the discussion, you should present them to the admin who deleted the article, User:Cirt, or if he declines you need to open a deletion review. Again, do not simply recreate the article, it will only be deleted again.
Amalthea 08:08, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Your edits to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prashanth Misale

Hello Br4011

Your recent edits to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prashanth Misale were added after the discussion was closed and archived. As it says in the archive summary, the "discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it." Accordingly, please do not further modify the archived discussion.

On the merits of the issue you address, I would note that Misale's upcoming work as a cinematographer was included in the article considered in the deletion discussion, and those who opined did not consider it sufficient to meet WP:CREATIVE. Being a cinematographer is not in and of itself notable.

Regards, Bongomatic 09:30, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Asal Thala.jpg

Concerning File:Asal Thala.jpg: Where can I find proof that either of the two images you uploaded there has been released under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0? From what I see at http://technotamil.blogspot.com/2009_04_01_archive.html there is no indication that the blog writer even owns copyright to the image (as indicated by the watermark), which is why I had to delete it again as a blatant copyright violation.
Have I not unblocked you under the provision that you HAVE to be careful with copyright violations? Why would you immediately upload yet another image? Seriously, this is your very last chance. If you upload one other copyrighted image, you leave no option but to block you from editing indefinitely. Please ASK BEFORE you upload any other image. Do NOT upload any other image you find somewhere on the internet.
Amalthea 10:25, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Alright, that's it. Since you continue to upload copyright violations, as just now with File:Starajith.JPG after my final final warning, I have blocked you indefinitely. I'm sorry that it came to this. Please do not go back to creating alternative accounts, or as I said previously a large part of IPs from Sri Lanka Telecom will need to be blocked as well. Amalthea 11:07, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Br4011 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Why did you do this. I did'n Make any Accounts or any mistakes. Any Problem please tell after i'll not do that. Every day I'am getting news From Ajith kumar Office I must give latest news to Asal. Please tell What is the Mistake I'll not do that mistake any more.

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  • understand what you have been blocked for,
  • will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  • will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information.  Sandstein  14:06, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• I did tell you above, you have acknowledged that final warning by removing it, but uploaded another one right away regardless. Amalthea 06:03, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Br4011 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Sir i'am Very sorry. First you see the Ajith Kumar Article there are no Ajith Photo. I'll not do this anymore. You even Upload a Ajith JPG and Put it. or Tell me What to do. Here after This mistake will not come. I'am sure. You Upload or tell me the way to Upload.

Decline reason:

Per other declines on this page. — Daniel Case (talk) 13:04, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Disabled second request, the one above is still active. Amalthea 09:28, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

I told you before: Don't upload any other image you find somewhere on the internet. You didn't listen. I can't upload one either. Yes, the article doesn't have a photo, but if there is no free picture available, then it can't be helped. This is "the free encyclopaedia", and except in very limited circumstances only free content is acceptable here. Amalthea 09:28, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Br4011 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Sir Forgive Last time. Here after I'll not not Upload any Photos, Only Editing. Please i'am very sorry. Forgive last time. Here after this like mistake came mins Dont Forgive Me Give a Warning and Block it.

Decline reason:

Per other declines. — Daniel Case (talk) 13:04, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Disabled third request, the one above is still active. And one is enough. Amalthea 11:20, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Hmm. Let's wait for an independent administrator to review this. From our interactions, I found that you are only willing to discuss when you are blocked. You have not responded to any of my messages otherwise. I had trusted you once and lifted a block, and you promptly returned to your previous pattern. I then left you another warning, you read it and ignored it. I don't like beeing fooled twice. You didn't even attempt to explain why you ignored all messages left for you. If a reviewing admins gives you another chance I'm fine with it, but I'm not prepared to unblock you myself. Amalthea 11:20, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Br4011 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Sir Please I'am a Fan of wikipedia.I'am Editing only Ajith Kumar and Asal. Please do Quikly. I'am a God's man I'll not tell lies. this is the last. Give me a Last chance. Please Forgive.

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  • understand what you have been blocked for,
  • will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  • will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information.  Sandstein  14:06, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Second request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Br4011 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Amaltea Sir Forgive me Last time. Here after I'll not not Upload any Photos without your Permission. I didn't see ur Final warning in my user talk page. That only maked me problem. Sir please forgive last time. I'll not do this any more. Hearafter I want to upload any photos mins i'll Discussed with u and only i'll Upload. Please For give.

Decline reason:

For putting up multiple requests at the same time, as well as issues noted below. — Daniel Case (talk) 12:37, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• You deleted my warning though, so it is pretty likely you saw it. How do you explain that? I also added made "stop uploading copyright infringing material" a condition of the original unblock, at User talk:Benraj44. Why did you ignore that, when all of your previous pictures were deleted as copyright violations as well? I'm sure you figured out that there must be a problem? Amalthea 06:58, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Br4011 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Amalthea Sir Dont misunderstand me. 13th May I didn't watch my user talk page That is the Mistake.. See your warning is up there. Sir I done a Wrong I know that Well. But that wrong came in by mistake. Understand my feelings. Hearafter this wrong will not Happen. Hear after I must upload any Pictures mins I'll concentrate with u and only i'll Upload. Please forgive and Give a Final Chance.

Decline reason:

per other request declined below. — Daniel Case (talk) 12:36, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• You didn't watch your user talk page? Will you please → click on this link ←? You have removed the warning on May 13, and three minutes later you've uploaded another image.
  The message is still up there because I restored it afterwards, to give the block message the context it needed.
  I hear your assertions that it won't happen again, and I want to believe you, but I find it less than satisfying that your answer to the above is only "it was a mistake". You've been asked three times to attempt an explanation why you made that mistake after numerous warnings.
  Also, please stop adding additional unblock requests. One active request is quite enough. I have said that twice before, too. Amalthea 09:57, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Br4011 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Amalthea Sir This is my Last Unblock Request. After your Wish. Sir in my Side have Mistakes i understand that. I'am a new to wikipedia. I'am Very sorry For that last indecent. Please give me A last Chance and Forgive me. I'll not Upload any images without your permission. This is promise behave of my mother. hear after this like not will happen. Sir i'am beliving you only. Please forgive and Unblock me. This is my last unblock request. I think that you will understand me. Very! very! very! very! Sorry.

Decline reason:

Per misleading unblock request contradicted in linked diff above. — Daniel Case (talk) 12:36, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• Friend, you are still not responding to what I am saying.

1. One of the big blue boxes that starts with "This blocked user is asking that his or her block be reviewed" and has a qestion mark at the top is enough. As long as there is one such box on this page, it means that you are still asking for a block review, and some uninvolved administrator will come by and have a look. Adding additional unblock requests while there is still one of those is only confusing, and not helpful.
   If you want to change the reasoning of an active unblock request, feel free to do so.
2. It appears you are still not reading or understanding what I am asking. Please read my above comment one more time, and try to answer the questions I am asking for once.
3. Have you read the guide to appealing blocks that User:Sandstein left you when he declined your previous unblock request?

Amalthea 10:50, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

{{Unblock|I'am Correctly answering you. you only not understanding. Sir, I done a wrong i knew that. That wrong came in a bymistake. That only I'am telling What to do. Mother promise i'am telling this Mistake will not happaen Again and Again. hear after i'll not do this. Please forgive me. Mother promise I'll not upload any messages without yor Permission. Please forgive. Sory sory.}}

Questions that must be answered or this unblock request will also be declined

Please type your answers in the spaces provided.

1. Do you understand that you are not allowed to upload pictures you find on the Internet?

   Answer: Yes. I understand. Hear after i'll not upload any Pictures without asking any Adminstrator.

2. Will you promise to not upload pictures that you find on the Internet?

   Answer: Mother Promise I'll not Upload Any Pictures.

3. Do you understand that if you remove a warning from this page, administrators must assume that you have read it?

   Answer: Yes. Hear after Every day i'll Read my User Talk Page.

4. Do you understand that you should only use one {{unblock}} request at a time?

   Answer: Yes. Very Sorry for the So Many Unblock Request.

5. Do you completely understand the rest of information left on this page for you by Amalthea?

   Answer: Yes I understand.

—Travis^talk 13:06, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Request for a Picture to Ajit's Page

Amathea Sir, Thanx for ur Work. I'll do my Work Clear. Sir, in Ajit's page dont have Ajit's Picture. I talled u before even. What is the idea to put picture into it. Without asking u i'll not do anything. --Br4011 (talk) 12:04, 21 May 2009

Unless you can personally take a picture of him, or you know of some picture that was explicitly released under a free license, then the article cannot have a picture at the moment.
If you want to keep looking for free pictures, then a good place might be Flickr; Every image there has a clear license attached, and some are licensed as e.g. "CC-by-SA 3.0", which is a free license compatible with Wikipedia. If you think you have found a free image check back with me first though!
Also, in the future, you should add new talk page sections at the bottom, not at the top. And stop calling me Sir. :) Amalthea 09:40, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Prabhakaran

Hi, you must be Brajbilla2007.

And no one knows 100% if Prabhakaran is dead or alive, although some may hope he is alive. But right now there are absolutely sources that say he is alive. I cannot change it because there are more sources saying that he is dead. We will wait and see which is true. Eelam StyleZ _(talk) 23:32, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Attempt to bypass copyright policy

Br4011, I can't believe what I'm seeing at Anwar Saadat's talk page (your edit). Explain what you were thinking, and why I should not permanently block you again after this attempt to circumvent our copyright policy? Explain it, or I will. And I don't want to hear that you are a big fan and his Wikipedia page needs to have one – this doesn't matter.
Amalthea 11:23, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

I'm waiting. Also, do not use fair use images without giving the image a fair use rationale that complies with each criterion of WP:NFC. This is not possible with movie posters on articles of the cast.
I'm serious about this. As I said on my talkpage, I blieve now that you are either unable or unwilling to comply with our copyright policies. All your edits need to be double checked, you still make grave mistakes in that area, but you refuse to just stay away from images. You persistently violate copyrights, so unless you give me a good reason not to, I will block this account for a year or so, hoping that after this time you will have matured enough to understand and follow policies. I've given you enough warnings and pointers, but all you do is try to circumvent them. Amalthea 14:17, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Oh.. I'am very sorry. I thought that I only cant Upload photos to Ajith kumar page. Then only I tall to Anwar. I dont no that wikipedia have rules like that. I'am very sorry. Amalthea did you get any free picture of ajit.
thanx Br4011 08:02, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

I find your explanation not satisfactory. My last word on the issue was: "The copyright owner must release it under a free license. If you take it from somewhere on the web and upload it to flickr, then you are not the copyright owner. [...] do not try to get any other image you find on the web to appear in the article." This made clear that the two images are not usable here on Wikipedia. Explain where you got that only you weren't allowed to upload the two images we discussed.
Amalthea 08:30, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Here only i took this picture. from ajithfans.com. Br4011 08:48, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

I know. But that's not an answer to my question. Amalthea 09:00, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

I difficult to understand your qusetion's Please right it clearly numbered. Thanx.Br4011 09:41, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

I know. And that is the cause of all our problem here.
I tried explaining it to you, but it didn't work, so I'll put it simply: Stay away from images.
If a free image becomes available, someone else will put it into the article.
Amalthea 09:55, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

←Here's another way to think about it—you have made many mistakes due to your limited understanding of Wikipedia's policies on copyrighted materials. Until you are certain that the inclusion of any material (pictures, text, or otherwise) qualifies—after checking with someone who is qualified to review the questionable material—do not post it, ask someone else to post it, rename it or move it somewhere that its origin may be disguised, suggest that someone else rename it so that its origin may be disguised, or in any way incorporate it into Wikipedia or encourage anyone else to do so. Instead try this:

1. Learn Wikipedia's policies.
2. Learn Wikipedia's guidelines.
3. Edit in a manner consistent with them.

Go back up to the "Welcome" section of your talk page for links to the Pillars of Wikipedia", which should help you get started.
Good luck,
Bongomatic 10:16, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

And another fraudulent attempt. So I've blocked you again indefinitely. If you don't listen, and so blatantly ignore our copyright policy after this immense show of patience above and on my talk page, then I can't help you, and we don't want your contributions here. Regards, Amalthea 14:19, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Sir i'didnt upload it. u see i saw this picture on ajit's page. some one as uploaded it. then only i just licensed it. no wrong in my side u must tell That user only. Br4011 14:44, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Yes, you didn't upload it. But when you saw it there, you uploaded it to your flickr account, violated copyright by mis-licensing it as CC-by, and then had the nerve to introduce that forged licence at the image page. I see two options: You either did that in a fraudulent attempt to have the image seem as a free image so that it won't be deleted here, or you still do not understand the first thing about copyright and our copyright policy despite being pointed to all necessary pages and being burnt by your uploads numerous times. And all that despite me telling you twice in no uncertain words to stay away from images. Either way it is, it's enough. Your edits are more harmful then helpful at this point, and our good will is exhausted. I'm tired of this game now. Come back in a year and ask for an unblock. Amalthea 14:58, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

U r correct. but that's not my wrong i thought that's a free image i searched all and lastly i uploaded to flickr account. Amalthea u didn't give me warning also u blocked it. i dont no that is a free image not. some who uploaded i done that. What are u telling to do me. Br4011 15:12, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

You got plenty warnings.
I am telling you: Come back in a year. Amalthea 15:43, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

See Amalthea. I'am new to wikipedia. i dont no much more about wikipedia like you. Last time Travis Unblocking time He asked some qusention Questions up to now i didn't do anything be have of that Questions. I gave a Copyright license to that image now that is the trouble. My big mistake is i thought that is a free image. U didn't advice me. up to now Travis and u telling only i'am liseting why are u doing me like this. now my brother also. I stayed away from images with your advice. I'll not hear anybody's advice any time. but in wikipedia I heared your advice much more time. You didn' give any warning about that copyright license. 1 time warned me mins i'll stay away from the copyright license also. Now block me through Uploading images And other Editing's. Dont block Ajith kumar and Asal Editing understand. Last time Un bloking time I learned about Creating to much Accounts. now still i didnt Create any Accounts. 2nd Unbloking time I learned about Uploading images now still i didn't upload any images. This time i learned about copyriht license. Please un block me to Ajithkumar and Asal articles only. Br4011 06:29, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Well, feel free to try another unblock request and get the opinion of another admin. I won't fall for it again. As I said, I see two possibilities to explain your blatantly incorrect licensing of that image, and neither is acceptable. Your claim of ignorance was enough to grant you two unblocks, and a slew of final warnings, but enough is enough. Only a couple of paragraphs above I told you as explicitly as I could, so that their could be no more misunderstandings, to stay away from images.
Well, you didn't. I can't help you, but maybe time will, that's why I asked you to come back in a year, and we can try this again. And this is my last word on the matter. Amalthea 09:17, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

I also think you should be blocked. I don't know if it's because you are very stubborn, or your ability to comprehend English is not up to the task, but Amalthea was more than clear about the sorts of actions that would lead to reblocking. Bongomatic 09:30, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Br4011 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I knew that i done a wrong. I gave the Copyright license to that image because I thought that is a free image. I didn't upload it. Hearafter i'll stay away from images. and I'll not give copyright license to any image. This The Last. Mother promise i'll not do this anymore. Please Forgive me. Br4011 11:01, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Decline reason:

The problem is, there are now other problems besides copyright infringement going on with your account. You have abused multiple accounts in the course of editing. Indefinite blocks are not infinite blocks, but I think some time for you to review copyright guidlines and the multiple account guidelines is in order - maybe not the year suggested by the admin who blocked you, but more than two days. —C.Fred (talk) 16:07, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• And I've received another unblock request from an IP claiming to be you. The unblock template is the appropriate mechanism for requesting an unblock; do not evade the block by leaving talk page messages with an IP. —C.Fred (talk) 03:08, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Sir, I knew that i have done the wrong. But sure, hopchurch is not my Account. Talk with my brother. we 2 using 1 computer. Sir in Asal film New Cast has Included Can u put that. I'll give the details with references. Amalthea Has before even blocked all My Account's and i Said Sorry also. Now hopchurch is not my Account understand. Last time please I must add detail's to Asal Please unblock me. Mother promise without Asking u I'll not do Any thing. User:br4011, Br4011 03:37, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

You said sorry, you said you won't do anything like it again, but still you evade your block by editing anonymously, both user talk pages and articles. How can we believe you, if you don't have the discipline to stick to your own promises? Amalthea 06:31, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

In that done any Wrong. Still you all are not understanding me. In Asal main casting as introduced Yesterday. No one didn't edit that. then only i edited. I'am telling i'll silently editing Ajith Kumar and Asal Articles only I'am not going to others problem. Then why are u disturbing me. I tall u I didn't upload that photo. I thought that is a free image and i upload it to flickr and gave license. i done any wrong mins u must tell to me. Like small children you must not block me. Without asking u i din't done any thing in wikipedia after your 1st block. You only not understanding me. See, now i'am telling I'll edit Ajith kumar and Asal Articles only. Please give permission to that only. Br4011 07:36, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Br4011 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Sir please unblock me. hearafter i'll stay away from images. Please forgive me and give a last chance. Please Br4011 Br4011 12:44, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Sorry, but your post above leads me to believe that you do not have strong enough comprehension of the English language to fully understand Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines or Wikipedia:Copyrights. Failing to follow these rules will only lead to be being blocked again. Might I suggest you contribute to the Tamil http://ta.wikipedia.org/ or Sinhalese [1] versions of Wikipedia in the meantime while you improve on your English language skills. So come back in a year's time and we'll be much more likely to give you a second chance then. Good luck. --  Netsnipe  ►  15:27, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Harris Jayaraj

Template:Harris Jayaraj has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Johannes003 (talk) 09:38, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

After a Long time Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Br4011 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Sir, Please Unblock my Account. I'am coming After a Long time. Hearafter in my side no Problems will come. Belive me. Please forgive. Sorry sorry. Thanx

Decline reason:

you have failed to give a reason to unblock, in that you have neither acknowledged your errors regarding copyright issues nor have you made a committment not to repeat them. If you wish to reformulate an unblock request taking these points on board please feel free to do so. --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 16:29, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Orphaned non-free image File:Pavithra poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pavithra poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 18 June 2023 (UTC)