April 2012

edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please note that your addition of Wikilinks to Volland-Stern Model in various articles in ineffective due to a syntax error. Volland-Stern model will be redlined. Corrections needed. To avoid such formatting problems, please preview all edits before saving. Thank you. Hertz1888 (talk) 16:32, 9 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

I fixed the problem in a couple of articles and left the rest for you. Please note that except for the initial letter, links are case-sensitive. Hertz1888 (talk) 00:50, 10 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit

Hello, Bnland, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! RockMagnetist (talk) 17:40, 21 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

May 2012

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Earth's rotation. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jc3s5h (talk) 13:43, 29 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Article nominated for deletion

edit

Nomination of Changes of the length of day for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Changes of the length of day is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Changes of the length of day until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

Changes of the length of day

edit

I noticed that you created the article "Changes of the length of day" but have never contributed to that article's talk page. Do you intend to improve that article and participate in talk page discussions? Jc3s5h (talk) 13:31, 6 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Talkback

edit
 
Hello, Bnland. You have new messages at RockMagnetist's talk page.
Message added 15:11, 8 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

RockMagnetist (talk) 15:11, 8 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your files at Commons

edit

Hello Bnland,

maybe you already noticed that three of the files you uploaded at Commons habe been nominated for deletion: Fieldstrengthdistance.jpg, Transferfunction.jpg and Sfericwaveform.jpg. That happened, because they were obviously scanned from some kind of book and there is currently no evidence that you have the right to scan and upload them. If you are the author of the printed originals, please leave a statement at the deletion requests linked above: In this case, there will surely be a way to prove your authorship. Please also make sure that you haven't "sold all your rights" to the publisher of the books(s): In this case you might not be allowed to re-publish your own work(!).

Thanks in advance, --El Grafo (talk) 15:58, 19 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Thermosphere (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Covington, Solar activity, Lyman, Spherical function, Ozon, Pederson and Dissociation

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:30, 28 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Earth–ionosphere waveguide (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Solar activity, Whistler, Sommerfeld and Dispersive

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 13 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

File permission problem with File:Thermwavemode.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Thermwavemode.jpg, which you've sourced to Atmospheric tidal and planetary waves. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:04, 25 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

File permission problem with File:Thermospheric wavemodes.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Thermospheric wavemodes.jpg, which you've sourced to Atmospheric tidal and planetary waves. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:05, 25 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

First, I want to thank you for working on and improving the Radio atmospheric article.

However, you have repeatedly added illustrations to that article. Those illustrations were apparently scanned from a book, so they were challenged. You apparently acknowledged that they were from a text that you allegedly wrote, but you were unsure whether you assigned the copyright to the publisher. The illustrations were removed. You then uploaded new copies. Those copies were removed. Now you have uploaded a third set, but you have provided no proof that you hold the copyright.

What proof do you have that you are not violating the publisher's copyright?

Users who repeatedly violate copyright laws may be blocked from editing.

Glrx (talk) 23:32, 16 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

 
Hello, Bnland. You have new messages at Glrx's talk page.
Message added 16:16, 18 October 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply
 
Hello, Bnland. You have new messages at Glrx's talk page.
Message added 15:20, 23 October 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

Glrx (talk) 15:20, 23 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Earth–ionosphere waveguide (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to ELF
Radio atmospheric (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to ELF

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 9 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply