User talk:BloodDoll/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5

April/May 2007 talk page archive

Comments & concerns

On my work in the Counter Vandalism Unit

April 2007

By 70.176.114.229

liberalism is a religion and it is the state religion in the nations listed 70.176.114.229 23:11, April 26, 2007 (sig added by BloodDoll to clarify who is making the comment.)

You took out a considerable amount of information in your edit. Such a major change to an article should first be discussed in the article's talk page before implementing it, otherwise it can be considered vandalism. Please take no personal offense, I am only trying to prevent vandalism on Wikipedia and your edit gave that impression. Feel free to continue contributing in a helpful way to Wikipedia. --BloodDoll 04:18, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

By 71.112.6.35

please, do not reinstate removed content from my talk page. i have received the message, that is what the page is there for. its not your place to come and put it back there. it is perfectly acceptable to remove warnings, especially illegitimate warnings.

please, do not leave me a response. i have been through this endless cycle before. you see an IP remove a warning, you figure the warning is legit without looking into it, and put it back up, the IP removes it which you consider vandalism, and so on.

71.112.6.35 05:56, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

• In response to 71.112.6.35: Regardless, it is considered vandalism to remove warnings from your talk page. Do not persist or you may be banned from editing Wikipedia temporarily.

• This User has been through this quite a bit, BloodDoll - over and over. They troll and vandalize. They have previously been warned under their other IP, User_talk:71.112.7.212. This is one to keep an eye on. --David Shankbone 06:03, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

• Thanks for the info, David. --BloodDoll 06:06, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

umm, no blooddoll. it is not vandalism, and you'd be unable to find a single instance of vandalism. read up on wiki policies please! please do not respond. 71.112.6.35

• If you persist in deleting warnings from your talk page, you will be temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia. This is your last warning. --BloodDoll 06:21, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

• I was wrong! While apparently frowned upon, it is not a blockable offense. Apologies to 71.112.6.35. --BloodDoll 07:27, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

blooddoll, i was a little irritated with your filing a report against me, but i can see you had wikipedias best interest in mind. peace. 71.112.6.35 07:23, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

• Sure, no personal offense meant. --BloodDoll 07:27, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

By 4.241.222.252

I deleted that paragraph from the America's Next Top Model 8 article because the episode has not aired yet. The articles for that show are notorious for people posting their predictions or speculation to throw people off while the show is currently in season. I was not intentionally vandalizing anything but rather removing content that was potentially (well, most likely) false. --4.241.222.252 08:35, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

• Fair enough. My apologies. --BloodDoll 08:40, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

By Brett 91091

For my edit to the user page of Sotomura, I apologize because I did not know the difference between a user page and a user talk page. And in regard to my user talk page, I would personally like it if you would not put down any things about vandalism. I personally do not people who vandalize. I have learned my lesson and I am truly sorry. Brett 91091 21:01, April 27, 2007 (Signature added by BloodDoll.)

• No problem! Most users are given plenty of chances to correct their mistakes or their behavior before being punished for them. Have fun contributing to Wikipedia! --BloodDoll 02:08, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

By 60.241.0.249

Thanks for the comment, but the JW discussion contains very lengthy content and an obivous matter of contention with I clarified with NPOV edit. 60.241.0.249 09:53, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Replies to my own comments

April 2007

By Sideshow Bob

No problem, I see this is the first time your user page has been vandalised. Congrats! Have fun dealing with those vandals, I only help ocassionally... Cheers. ;) Sideshow Bob 23:27, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

May 2007

By Juhachi

Good to hear that there are others as enthusiastic as I am about this series; that is why I brought it up to GA. Well, that and Kashimashi was the first article I edited on Wikipedia, so I thought I owed it to myself to make it GA, especially because I love the series so much. If you can find more info on reception, and on the light novel, that would be much appreciated as those sections still need work done on them. Any help to the sub pages, List of Kashimashi episodes, List of Kashimashi albums, and List of Kashimashi characters would be greatly appreciated as well.--十八 05:22, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Yes, that would be helpful to add in the review from that issue of Newtype USA as I do not have that issue. And as for the subpages, List of Kashimashi episodes was just promoted to a featured list, so I guess there isn't much else that can be done there. With List of Kashimashi characters, the main thing is the lead which should be expanded. Other than that, character profiles from most of the supporting characters need expanding as well; hell, even Tomari doesn't have as much info as either Hazumu or Yasuna. As for List of Kashimashi albums, the lead also needs to be expanded, and then the tracks on the drama CD should be translated into romaji, though I've just been lazy about not doing those things. Oh, and track lengths and albums lengths also have to be added in. Oricon chart listings should be included and then any sales figures about the albums on how well they sold, but those last two things are really meant for when/if the list goes for a featured list, which I do not intend on doing as it would be a daunting task and I would first try it on a smaller album list, such as List of Tomoyo After soundtracks which only has two albums.

As for the main article at Kashimashi, it would be awesome if we could get it up to a Featured Article, but that seems next to impossible. I recently tried getting Strawberry Panic! up to a featured article, but it proved difficult, even though I know I was close. Improvements to the main article of Kashimashi would include expanding on the Adaptations sections, such as the internet radio shows and the light novel. Anime section could be expanded to include production. Any reception you could find that comply with Wikipedia:Attribution, like the Newtype USA article would help greatly, especially reviews for the visual novel.--十八 06:41, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Re: List of Kashimashi episodes

It's not missing references; they're at the bottom of the list, but I guess you mean inline references which reference the episodes themselves. Since the episode descriptions come from the episodes they are listed under, it would be redundant to add in inline references for them, if that is what you meant. Or did you mean inline references in the lead?--十八 21:38, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Mistakes (d'oh!)

Anti-Vandalism

April 2007

AIV report of 71.112.6.35

You reported 71.112.6.35 (talk · contribs) to WP:AIV for removing warnings from their talk page. While frowned upon, on numerous occasions the community has failed to reach consensus that this type of behavior constitutes a blockable offense. Please feel free to issue warnings for genuine vandalism, but don't violate the WP:3RR over the warnings themselves. —dgies^t_c 06:31, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

• Righto, thanks. I'm new, so I wasn't aware of that rule or the policy on removing warnings from talk pages. I'll keep both in mind. --BloodDoll 06:34, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5