January 2013 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pick TV. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Pick TV was changed by Blacklisting (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.962513 on 2013-01-29T20:38:01+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:38, 29 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Living TV Group with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Torreslfchero (talk) 20:44, 29 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

 

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at BBC Three idents, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: BBC Three idents was changed by Blacklisting (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.916593 on 2013-01-29T21:53:57+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:54, 29 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

March 2013 edit

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Channel M, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Hughpugh 19:52, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. [[ axg ◉ talk ]] 23:22, 15 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Jaredvaldez4 edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page that you created was tagged as a test page and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. — Tomcat (7) 20:45, 17 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of JetÉire edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on JetÉire requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. —Ignatzmicetalkcontribs 20:32, 14 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for April 23 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lloyds TSB, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TSB (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 23 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

May 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm AxG. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! [[ axg ◉ talk ]] 17:23, 3 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Closedmouth (talk) 15:45, 5 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Unblock declined edit

Your unblock requests are hereby declined, and I have removed your ability to edit this page. If you wish to appeal your block in the future, please contact WP:UTRS or the Arbitration Committee. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 16:50, 6 May 2013 (UTC)Reply