Bisexual Orchid
Revert of banned user edit
To which user do you refer? [1] Is there a ban notice you can point to? --mav (reviews needed) 01:55, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
- Ditto this. Can you slow down and explain? These edits seemed to be constructive and I don't see anything wrong with them. Plus, you're reverting over other editors' efforts to clean them up, e.g. at Nepenthes ampullaria another editor already cleaned up the edits of the IP. Rkitko (talk) 01:58, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
I'm going to revert your reverts in 5 minutes if there is no response. --mav (reviews needed) 02:11, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
No explanation = your edits have been reverted. --mav (reviews needed) 02:20, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
This is the ban [2]
Its clear this user is a single purpose troll account. I am reverting its edits. They are highly unconstructive. There was absolutely no discussion on talk pages before performing these radical edits, and using a 'look there's Elvis' diversion tactic to justify trolling in out of line. This account has reverted researched and thorough content involving many hard hours of work and diligent research. This is very disruptive and uncivil, as well as intellectually dishonest. 69.171.160.39 (talk) 06:20, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. edit
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Shirt58 (talk) 13:13, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
SOCKS edit
I AM NOT A SOCK. CALL MY CELL PHONE AND I WILL PROVE IT. STOP VANDALIZING MY USER PAGE. POSTING OF ANY BANNING NOTICES WILL RESULT IN TAKING ACTION.