User talk:BhaiSaab/A7

Latest comment: 17 years ago by Dev920 in topic Yo
Archive

Archives


1 2 3 4 5 6

Arbitration edit

Your suggestion is valid and right. However, I would rather have users understand that I meant Israel as a political entity rather than the people of Israel, considering I've already made the statement. BhaiSaab talk 04:08, 16 November 2006 (UTC)Reply
Think about how it makes people feel. Fred Bauder 04:09, 16 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

RE:Template edit

Nice job on Template:Islam by country.

thanks but please help me in filling out the red links7day 11:43, 16 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Merger edit

Are you going to merge the muslim guild tonight or tomorrow? Dev920 (Please peer review here.) 15:44, 16 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Muslim Guild is still there. Would you like me to merge it for you? Please let me know and I'd be happy to do so. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 14:51, 20 November 2006 (UTC)Reply
Sure. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 17:12, 20 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Note from Muhammad mediation edit

Hi there, I am just dropping you a note because you signed up to participate at Talk:Muhammad/Mediation. We have not heard from you since we started discussing proposed criteria for including images, so I'm just asking whether you plan to participate further. If so, we need you to agree or disagree to the criteria we have developed. Important note: The criteria will be used only if the group decides to include images, which will be later in the mediation. Agreeing to the criteria does not mean that you agree to including any images. Thanks! --Aguerriero (talk) 23:15, 16 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Apology edit

You have my apology for making those statements on Talk:Indian caste system. I'm striking them out.Hkelkar 03:51, 17 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

BS? edit

You do realize that I will check your "Muslim Connunities ref." right?

http://utdirect.utexas.edu/lib/utnetcat/full.WBX?search_type=FL&search_text=MUSLIM+COMMUNITIES+OF+SOUTH+ASIA+CULTURE+AND+SOCIETY&next_action=N&next_record_brn=000355470&loc_display_type=V http://utdirect.utexas.edu/lib/utnetcat/full.WBX?search_type=FL&search_text=MUSLIM+COMMUNITIES+OF+SOUTH+ASIA+CULTURE+AND+SOCIETY&next_action=N&next_record_brn=008360060&loc_display_type=V

Might want to consider your edits.Hkelkar 04:40, 17 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

24 hr block for revertwarring on Indian caste system edit

 
You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

Rama's arrow 13:54, 18 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Re: Advocacy edit

Hi - ideally, we're there to advise one party, so yes, we're like a lawyer in that repsect. However, at times we try to seek compromises, which ends up with us being more like mediators. Hopefully this answers your question. Martinp23 15:46, 19 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

RfaR edit

See User_talk:Bakasuprman/Majorcontributors, you've edited my talk page more times than Hkelkar and subhash_bose combined.Bakaman Bakatalk 16:35, 19 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Sentence in dispute edit

BhaiSaab, could you please let me know the sentences in dispute. A link would be enough. Thanks --Aminz 01:09, 20 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

BhaiSaab please have a look at this:

http://books.google.com/books?vid=ISBN0887069185&id=UyrTm4k29UMC&pg=PA116&lpg=PA116&vq=nasab&dq=Advice+on+the+art+of+governance,an+Indo-Islamic+Mirror+for+Princes&sig=_awYsO_kucOslCLofwr74agrprQ

This is Hklekar's source. --Aminz 02:53, 20 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

The source is presenting the view of some medieval Indian Muslim scholars. --Aminz 02:56, 20 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Arbitrator edit

I thought you were some random user and I was about to tell you not to respond to my statements on the case page but then I noticed that you're a part of Arbcom, lol. I have responded to one of your proposed decisions. BhaiSaab talk 22:56, 15 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Your suggestion is valid and right. However, I would rather have users understand that I meant Israel as a political entity rather than the people of Israel, considering I've already made the statement. BhaiSaab talk 04:08, 16 November 2006 (UTC)Reply
Okay, but be sure to check out these statements as well. BhaiSaab talk 05:35, 16 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Where are the other arbitrators? Why are you the only one working? BhaiSaab talk 15:55, 20 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

I am just the advance party. However I usually am the only one who uses the /Workshop page. I like it because it gives people a chance to give some feedback. Fred Bauder 18:19, 20 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Warning edit

I have given you a warning like this before here. But you don't seem to get the point. Was there any need to make this very intelligent comment. This is your last warning. I will block you if you make one more remark like that on any talk page. - Aksi_great (talk) 20:07, 20 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

As far as I know any encyclopedia or wiki is not considered as a reliable source. I will have check on that and let you know. And 2 wrongs do not make a right. - Aksi_great (talk) 20:21, 20 November 2006 (UTC)Reply
I have confirmed with other admins and it looks like Encyclopedia of Islam is a reliable source. So that is my bad. I apologise. But my earlier warning still stays. It would do you well not to retort to every comment made by Hkelkar. - Aksi_great (talk) 20:30, 20 November 2006 (UTC)Reply
Looks like our messages crossed. Yes. I was the one misinformed here. - Aksi_great (talk) 20:32, 20 November 2006 (UTC)Reply
Yes. That is the root of the problem. Don't get upset. It's easy once you get the hang of it. I thought you would be the last person to get upset by things he does. - Aksi_great (talk) 20:33, 20 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

3RR and talk edit

See Talk:Antisemitism#My revert.

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. ←Humus sapiens ну? 05:11, 21 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Please self revert BhaiSaab. Please! --Aminz 05:55, 21 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

BhaiSaab, please self revert --Aminz 05:56, 21 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

There is a report here [1] --Aminz 05:58, 21 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Self-revert BhaiSaab, this is an order :P --Aminz 06:00, 21 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. --Aminz 06:01, 21 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Let's chat offline. --Aminz 06:03, 21 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Do you use yahoo messenger? --Aminz 06:07, 21 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

i.e. Is there any way to chat online? :) --Aminz 06:11, 21 November 2006 (UTC)Reply


check this out edit

[[2]]

== == Don't feed the troll!NinaEliza 09:32, 21 November 2006 (UTC) == ==Reply

One last time edit

I will only converse with you on wikipedia.Do not contact me by any other means.Hkelkar 17:45, 21 November 2006 (UTC)Reply
Sayed, don;t harass me off wikipedia or this will become a police case. I am warning you.Hkelkar 17:59, 21 November 2006 (UTC)Reply
Please don;t waste my time. Read a book.Hkelkar 18:22, 21 November 2006 (UTC)Reply
Creates the first true Bose-Einstein Condensate,Quantum Computing,Quantum optics, Mesotechnology, verifies some theoretical models. Cold Atoms are tunable systems and can be used to do a lot of other things, such as simulate various Quantum phase transitions, manipulate small numbers of atoms etc. It's the future of Physics. The Nobel Prize in 2001 was awarded for Cold Atom Experiments.Hkelkar 18:29, 21 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Yo edit

Why have you quit WikiProject Islam? Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 17:43, 23 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

I believe you have the capacity to be a great editor, but you cannot be so on articles related to religion. If you intend to end editing those articles, and edit something that does not raise such strong emotion in you, I wish you well, and if you need my help for anything, ask. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 17:51, 23 November 2006 (UTC)Reply