March 2010

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page File:Paul Nicholas Nottingham 27.02.2010.jpg has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. raseaCtalk to me 21:46, 13 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

[[File:Paul Nicholas Nottingham 27.02.2010.jpg]]

edit

Please upload a new file rather than replace an existing one. Thanks, raseaCtalk to me 22:54, 19 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Not liking an image is not a good reason to delete it. Copyright infringement is (and it looks as if that's what is going to happen if the uploader does not provide the required details by the 26th). If you have a WP:COI it is proably best not to edit the article/image in question. In the meantime, please do not replace images with different ones. raseaCtalk to me 23:07, 19 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

AN/I

edit

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. raseaCtalk to me 23:15, 19 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

  If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Paul Nicholas, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. raseaCtalk to me 23:47, 19 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Could you clarify for us what your rights are regarding this photo? It doesn't seem like you'd actually be the author of it. If you own the rights to it, that's probably enough to keep it around; but we do need to know what the actual deal is. Thanks. Equazcion (talk) 23:52, 19 Mar 2010 (UTC)

Email

edit

Hi Beunic. Could you please email me at ryanpostlethwaite@hotmail.com. I'm an administrator on Wikipedia and I'd like to help you. Regards, Ryan PostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 00:13, 20 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Paul New pic -Vincenzo Photography.jpg

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Paul New pic -Vincenzo Photography.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --FASTILYsock(TALK) 01:52, 21 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

January 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Paul Nicholas may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • [Union-Castle Line]] ships between England and South Africa. His maternal grandfather was a London [[docker]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:17, 18 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Beunic. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply