Image Tagging Image:Brix.jpg edit

 
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Brix.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Longhair 07:32, 2 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Links to your website edit

Hi, welcome to Wikipedia. Can you please stop adding your website to articles? In most cases I've looked at, the links add no encyclopedic value to the article, and only seem to serve as advertising. Thanks. Cnwb 22:02, 6 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Bent monkey cage edit

Bent monkey cage has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt this business might not be notable enough for an article. Please review WP:CORP for relevant guidelines. Improve the article to address these concerns if possible.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the prod notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. NickelShoe 03:10, 7 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

BENT MONKEY CAGE and/or circuit bending is legally and formally the first Company that published a BOOK on CIRCUIT BENDING. Copyright USA Library of Congress 2003. Why delete me from your site. I am not trying to advertise. This will be my last attempt to edit. thank you Lee Daniel Perry at bMc in California
Hey there. Try to remember to sign posts on talk pages with ~~~~. When you save the page, it converts it to a link to your user page and the date, so I can find you more easily.
It's not my site. I'm just a regular editor like you. In fact, I'm not even the one who submitted the article for deletion. I simply saw that it had been proposed for deletion, and thought you'd like to know, so you could improve or defend it. There is a record of a deletion discussion from September at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Bent_monkey_cage. Wikipedia can't maintain articles on every company, so we have certain standards for notability. Did you read the guidelines at WP:CORP? They aren't very strict, but simply require the company to have been reviewed by third parties. NickelShoe (Talk) 06:45, 22 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/BentMONKEYcage.com concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/BentMONKEYcage.com, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:06, 20 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/BentMONKEYcage.com edit

 

Hello Bentmonkeycage. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "BentMONKEYcage.com".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/BentMONKEYcage.com}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 10:01, 16 January 2014 (UTC)Reply