December 2012

edit

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at United Airlines, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jetstreamer Talk 20:02, 30 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BatteriesAreIncluded (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

My first edit was not vandalism. My brothers asked me to help....

Decline reason:

Signing up for the sole purpose of helping someone continue to disrupt Wikipedia is good reason to be blocked from editing. -- Ed (Edgar181) 20:13, 30 December 2012 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You're not blocked. Yet.--Jetstreamer Talk 20:05, 30 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  King of 20:06, 30 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppetry case

edit
 

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BatteriesAreIncluded for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. TBrandley (what's up) 20:28, 30 December 2012 (UTC)Reply