Harry Styles edit

Please introduce reliable sources to verify your claims about Harry Styles. I would like to remind you that WP:BLP applies here. GiantSnowman 15:02, 22 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Talk edit

Hello ! I saw your participation on the List_of_fictional_child_prodigies. I'm french and I recently published a " Liste de personnages intellectuels, surdoués et apparentés" [[ https://fr.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_de_personnages_intellectuels,_surdou%C3%A9s_et_apparent%C3%A9s]] that is almost the same topic (in frech :) ) but, I don't know why is proposed for deletion. If you would, please, support the page by posting a "conserver" message on the discussion page, you'll have one billion euros ! (Or my greetings) Belaparte (talk) 23:33, 18 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

May 2014 edit

  Thank you for your edit to the disambiguation page Smart. However, please note that disambiguation pages are not articles; rather, they are meant to help readers find a specific article quickly and easily. From the disambiguation dos and don'ts, you should:

  • Be familiar with the guidelines and style
  • Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
  • Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
  • Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry
    • Only add a "red link" if used in an article, and include the "blue link" to that article
  • Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
  • Do not insert external links or references

Thank you. Widefox; talk 11:37, 27 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppet investigation edit

 

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Batman194, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Widefox; talk 12:51, 27 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Harold Finch (Person of Interest) for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Harold Finch (Person of Interest) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harold Finch (Person of Interest) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

''Flux55'' (talk) 19:22, 13 February 2024 (UTC)Reply