Bagelbites3
Hello! edit
This is for our AWD class, I like your username! P Bobodyne (talk) 20:03, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
Salutations edit
Hello, your name makes me hungry. MarineBiologistLaura (talk) 20:05, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
Welcome! edit
Hello, Bagelbites3, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 21:28, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello. edit
Normally, your name would also make me hungry. But my sick self doesn't even want to think about food right now. Hillaryjd (talk) 18:18, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Peer Review Round 1 edit
Major Points I really like the language you are using in the Taxol section, it feels like a great balance of getting the information across while keeping it available to a more public audience. I do wonder about linking a couple more of your slightly higher-order words back to other WP pages, such as "Photo-Affinity Analogues" and "Tubulin". I was able to guess what they were from context but more info from at least a link seems like it would be good. One other thing would be the possibility of naming any relevant members of her "team", you mention various teams she was a part of or a head of at different points but don't seem to name anyone in particular.
Minor Points There are a couple points where it looks like you have a citation in parentheses to remind yourself to cite, just make sure to go back and include those. Some of the sentences could be restructured a bit, particularly with comma uses: "Instead, it must be given to patients in a different solubilizing substance, called Cremophor, which happens to be a low-grade substance to be present in the human system" could be reframed to be a little smoother to read.
Doriineia (talk) 18:47, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Article Suggestions edit
From a systematic standpoint make article a lot shorter; I understand the necessity of using a more established scientist, Jane Goodall, for article comparison, but you can run into the issue of using too many Albert Einstein Med cited sources. Article feels like a biography tone rather than wiki article. Only include the most important details: example: "after realizing that her true calling was research" feels unnecessary in discussion. Check this notability guide for help. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(people). Also break up paragraph blocks into sections. I would change the title "recent works" to something else (maybe years 2000 - present). Overall good, but perhaps maybe too thorough. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RedMarket19 (talk • contribs) 19:00, 25 March 2016 (UTC