Image tagging for Image:Apple kithen saiz.jpeg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Apple kithen saiz.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We requires this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:05, 26 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Your secret pages

edit

Sorry, but this is bordering on silly. Please stop, as the pages you are creating are not a genuine attempt to improve the Wikipedia project. Giles Bennett (Talk, Contribs) 21:12, 26 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

  This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as User:BB Pacifica/realsecreatpage/myrealsecretpagenumber2/myrealsecretpagenumber3/yeahyoudidit/myrealspecialsecretpage/youwin/iamgivingyouahint/xyz/vxy/myuserpage/youronfire/stopdropandroll/Igiveup/yourprize, you will be blocked from editing. Giles Bennett (Talk, Contribs) 21:14, 26 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yourprize

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Yourprize, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Giles Bennett (Talk, Contribs) 21:13, 26 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

January 2008

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 21:23, 26 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BB Pacifica (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I had my last warning and I have not made a vandlism edit since.

Decline reason:

You were continuing to create subpages as I was checking your contributions before I blocked you. You can wait 48 hours. — Jauerbackdude?/dude. 21:35, 26 January 2008 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.