User talk:Axiomm/archive1

Removing RfA votes

Hi there. For some reason you deleted my RfA vote. RfA votes shouldn't be removed. Is there any reason you removed it? You even went to the trouble to update the vote talley to reflect removing my vote. This is considered vandalism. If you have any questions, please leave them for me at my talk page. --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 00:10, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Vary, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. -Colin Kimbrell 16:31, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

The edit in question is [1], where you manually increased the automatic vote total in addition to voting legitimately. -Colin Kimbrell 16:31, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

That vote looks fine to me. I think this user just updated the vote tally (accurately) unless I am missing something. I'd like to assume good faith though. However, that still doesn't explain why Axiomm removed my vote. --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 13:08, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Lost at sea

Hello! I notice that you have created two articles regarding the above book with identical content. It would probably be better to remove the version that starts with Book.., do you agree? If there is more than one article with this title then they can be differentiated with a disambiguation page or a comment on the first page to be located with a search. Regards,  (aeropagitica)  17:58, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Humbierto

Humbierto has been proposed for deletion as a suspected hoax. Please provide sources for the information. NickelShoe 21:25, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Hi. The Humbierto article was deleted, and I see that you recreated it. I'm going to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where you can see what reasons people provide for why it should be deleted, and you can say why you think it should be kept. I'll let you know now that the main policy you'll be referred to is Wikipedia:Verifiability; you might want to read that now. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. -GTBacchus^(talk) 07:01, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

The deletion discussion is taking place here. -GTBacchus^(talk) 07:23, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

My RfA

WikiThanks

Thanks for supporting my RFA. I really appreciated the show of support and all the kind words from so many great Wikipedians. I hope I live up to them! -- Vary | Talk 18:04, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

tropical storm lance

see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tropical Storm Lance, the page was deleted. --W.marsh 01:37, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

If you continue to recreate this properly-deleted article, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Naconkantari e|t||c|m 03:56, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

what are you trying to do? Axiomm 03:56, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. Naconkantari e|t||c|m 03:59, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Awww, you did this because you couldn't agree with that page being up. You kept messing or deleting the page and now you made the page read only. is this why you blocked me? it seems like i can only edit this talk page. Axiomm 06:36, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Feel free to edit Wikipedia after your block expires, but keep in mind that the article Tropical Storm Lance has been deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policy, so it should not be recreated with another title without a good reason. Naconkantari e|t||c|m 07:31, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

The fact that an article was deleted (by you) is not enough to justify blocking another user's edit rights. Axiomm 01:47, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Calling another administrator a vandal when they were properly following policy is considered a personal attack, which warrants a block. Naconkantari e|t||c|m 01:54, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Elliott Yamin

Why was his page considered for deletion?Va girl2468 22:29, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

The page documents him being a contestant on American idol. I don't think that's enough to merit having a page in the mainspace Axiomm 00:59, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Deletion discussions

Do not falsely close deletion discussions (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TropicaI Storm Jason, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Humbierto). You have no right to do that; this is up to administrators to do (except when there is an unambiguous consensus for keeping the article, or when the article has been deleted and the admin forgot to close the discussion). See Wikipedia:Deletion process for details.

The next time you improperly close a discussion, you will be blocked from Wikipedia. Consider yourself warned! - Mike Rosoft 20:29, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

• What are you talking about? I closed them, because they were clearly deletions. Axiomm 03:13, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Exactly. You are not supposed to close discussions when the decision is to delete the article, but only when it is to keep it, and only after the time for discussion (normally 5 days) has expired. Again, please read the page on deletion process, especially the section on Non-Administrators closing discussions. - Mike Rosoft 10:53, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

Andruw Jones

Looks like the player's first name is spelled "Andruw", not "Andrew". And even if "Andrew" were the correct spelling, the period doesn't belong to the end of the article's title. I guess I know how it occured; you thought that the name was misspelled, tried moving it to Andrew Jones - and when the article couldn't be moved because the target name was already occupied, you tried to force the move in this way. (Had you looked at the Andrew Jones page, you would have found out that we are aware of the non-traditional spelling.) The next time you want to move an article and are not sure what to do, please list it at Wikipedia:Requested moves; there are more than enough experienced editors to help you. (You may also want to consult Wikipedia:Naming conventions.) Thank you. - Mike Rosoft 22:30, 17 March 2006 (UTC)