November 2021

edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Metropolitan Homoeopathic Medical College & Hospital, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Dl2000 (talk) 23:30, 10 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

  One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. EN-Jungwon 08:43, 11 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Your recent edits to User talk:EN-Jungwon could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 13:25, 11 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Metropolitan Homoeopathic Medical College & Hospital. EN-Jungwon 15:24, 11 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

April 2023

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission, as you did at Metropolitan Homoeopathic Medical College & Hospital. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  DanCherek (talk) 02:31, 30 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Unblocking Request

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Avidiptahazra (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Information added after getting permission from authority. As per policy, it is not under copyright violation.I also mentioned it into changes description box. Kindly look into it, other-wise i will send legal notice. Thank s.Avidiptahazra (talk) 05:18, 30 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Making a legal threat is pretty much an automatic decline. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:23, 30 April 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Avidiptahazra (talk) 05:18, 30 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Avidiptahazra (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Information added after getting permission from authority. As per policy, it is not under copyright violation.I also mentioned it into changes description box. Kindly look into it. Avidiptahazra (talk) 07:12, 30 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

You will need to explicitly withdraw your legal threat. You will also need to address your relationship with the college that seems to be a conflict of interest. The website of the college clearly states "all rights reserved"; if someone from the college with the authority to do so has donated the text at issue, that needs to be demonstrated. In any event, it is preferred to use original text that summarizes what independent reliable sources state about a topic. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 07:40, 30 April 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

UTRS appeal #72817

edit

is declined. User doubled down on their legal threat there. --Yamla (talk) 10:49, 30 April 2023 (UTC)Reply