Armanvino

Welcome!

Hello, Armanvino, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Arman vino, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! RunnyAmiga (talk) 22:30, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Arman vino

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Arman vino, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. RunnyAmiga (talk) 22:30, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

August 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but in this edit you removed a speedy deletion tag from Arman vino, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:32, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to Arman vino. Please make your case on the page's talk page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:36, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Your article Arman Vino

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Arman Vino to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. AllyD (talk) 11:20, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Armanvino, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

My Pants Metal (talk) 12:25, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Armanvino (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Why I can't create the Arman Vino page? I have a Source Hamidea (talk) 17:06, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This account currently isn't blocked, though that may change due to sockpuppetry or meatpuppetry. I have blocked User:Hamidea for that reason. The reason they cannot create an article is because whe thrice had to delete it already; we salted the earth to stop repeated recreations of that page. If there are references that weren't around yesterday, or earlier today, WP:Articles for creation is available to create a draft and to submit it for a review by an experienced editor. One source won't be enough, though, and you should also check out WP:Autobiography, WP:MUSIC and WP:SPAM. Writing about yourself is not a good idea. Huon (talk) 17:51, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

October 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Huon (talk) 21:17, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Request to unblock an account

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Armanvino (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello, My account has been blocked but I am innocent. In the past, I created a content using this account, but my post was not approved and was deleted. Given that I was not aware of Wikipedia's policies and laws, but this time I wrote a lot of great stuff with the right sources. (According to Wikipedia rules) But here's a problem. The Arman Vino page is protected by one manager and I can not enter anything at all. That's why I talked to Block Manager on the discussion page and he told me that I must to disable my newer accounts. I disabled the newer accounts but quickly got blocked and even blocked my main account (armanvino) but I do not know why. I did not do sabotage with my main account (armanvino). Please, and please help me and please unblock my main account: (armanvino). Thanks a lot Armanvino (talk) 22:53, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Considering the socking has been continuing even within the last 24 hours, no. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 23:06, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Boing! said Zebedee: What should I do now to unblock my account? Armanvino (talk) 09:44, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

You could try the WP:Standard offer, and stay away for at least six months without using any other accounts. Then make a new unblock request in which you promise not to write about yourself and tell us what you would instead do to help us build our encyclopedia if unblocked. That might sound tough, but I think it's unlikely anyone will offer you anything better, especially as you have been continuing the abuse of multiple accounts in order to write about yourself even while making these appeals and while claiming innocence. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:12, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

@Boing! said Zebedee: So who can write about me if I do not write Armanvino (talk) 10:38, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and is different to sites like Facebook, and only accepts articles about people when they have achieved certain minumum notability standards. The requirements for musicians are are WP:NMUSIC, and nothing you have written so far indicates that you meet them yet. Should you one day achieve those notability standards and there are multiple independent reliable sources (see WP:RS) writing about you in some depth from which to source an article, then anyone who is not connected with you would be welcome to write about you. The latest draft which was submitted had lots of links, but they were all to things like Youtube, Google, and your own pages, and there was none to reliable independent sources writing about you in depth. So for now, it has to be no, sorry - but I wish you well in your career. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:10, 4 October 2017 (UTC)