AppleBloke (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am sorry. I began my time on Wikipedia essentially trying to "backseat moderate" the unblocking of another user. I truly would like to help expand the knowledge base of the world and would appreciate a second chance to do so. I will not try to influence who is blocked or unblocked, when I'm not informed enough about Wiki policy, am not in a position of authority, and was not assuming good faith. I will sincerely try to work to improve this great database of knowledge. Also, I'm not a sockpuppet, and I'm not sure why it was thought that I am one. Thank you for your time and consideration. Submitted with my most sincere regards: AppleBloke (talk) 14:11, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am wholly unable to accept that any editor could possibly start off here in this way. To me your request is not believable. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 14:28, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
AppleBloke (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I'm really and truly sorry that I started my Wiki career off on a rather confrontational foot, and I deeply apologize for doing so. I really do want to help Wikipedia as best I can and I sincerely hope that you will give me the benefit of the doubt. If I screw up again, I will your unwillingness to forgive me, but until then, all I ask for is a second chance. I have found a page which at this point is quite weak. The article is on the quantum gyroscope, around which my current doctoral work is centered. I have very extensive knowledge on the subject as well as access to academic literature for citations. The section I would add first would be about the stress-energy tensor of the gyroscope as it relates to graph theory. The 4 isomorphic graphs of the energy tensory come in 4 variants, Isomorph A, B, C, and D, of which A is equal to the original graph. I would add (citing all the sources too mind you) information about how they are variably spliced and how that makes these isomorphs functionally different. Secondly, I would greatly expand the current section on Principle, as the current information is outdated. New interactions are being constantly identified and this will help people using wikipedia for references into papers on the subject and as a reference point for quantum mechanics. Third, the reading list does not contain any current literature. There are new journal articles that are subjected on quantum gyroscopes that are much more current than the reading list and I would like to see that updated too.
In summary, this page is very incomplete. There is quite a lot of information available to put on this page, enhance it, and compile the references making it a wonderful way for newer users to understand the function of quantum gyroscopes both in technical and laymen's terms. I sincerely hope you will assume good faith on my part, and I promise that what I do on Wikipedia will never again be an issue. Sincerely, AppleBloke (talk) 14:46, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon::==( o ) 15:13, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
AppleBloke (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Could you elaborate? I honestly have no clue what you are talking about and would like to know what I can do to be able to contribute to Wikipedia. AppleBloke (talk) 15:23, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
In simple terms, there is technical evidence that you created this account after your previous account was blocked. We call that "block evasion." OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:46, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
AppleBloke (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Could you please show me this technical evidence? Which account are you asserting I am affiliated with? AppleBloke (talk) 18:46, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
First, we don't do that ... I think you could easily understand that if we made the technical evidence public, it would be closely studied by current and future sockpuppeteers to improve their ability to evade detection by checkuser. We don't want that. Second, and more importantly, this is your fourth unblock request, and you really haven't raised any new issues. Since your narrative has become tiresome, I'm going to revoke your talk page access so we can devote our attention to people who just might possibly deserve to be unblocked. Have a nice day. — Daniel Case (talk) 01:29, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Question for you, how as a brand new user, did you come across that user talk page? GB fan 19:37, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
- He won't be able to answer it, at least not here ...
(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If you have already appealed to the Unblock Ticket Request System and been declined you may appeal to the Arbitration Committee's Ban Appeals Subcommittee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.
Daniel Case (talk) 01:31, 11 July 2014 (UTC)