Anthonyzp

Image source problem with Image:N4208990797 1215.jpg

Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:N4208990797 1215.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:00, 2 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. HermesBot 13:00, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Copyright status of Waverley Old Boys Football Club

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Waverley Old Boys Football Club. For legal reasons, we will delete copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites (http://www.waverleyoldboys.com/club_history.asp in this case) or from printed material.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article's talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Waverley Old Boys Football Club with a link to where we can find that note;
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article's talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Waverley Old Boys Football Club with a link to the details.

Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own original words to avoid any copyright infringement. Thank you. --Finngall ^talk 13:56, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Hi. I'm not sure exactly what the copyright requirements are, but you should at the very least sign your message on the talk page. (Put four tildes like this ~~~~ to sign.) If you got an email giving you permission, I think you should state that you got an email and the date of the email, who it was to and the name of the person it was from. I'm not sure whether you would be supposed to put a copy of the email on the talk page. Actually, now that I think of it, I don't think it's good enough to just get permission to put the information on Wikipedia. You must get permsision to license the information under the GFDL. That means that not only can it go on the Wikipedia website, but also other people can copy it, etc. Anyway, I suspect the message you put on the talk page isn't enough. (See Wikipedia:Copyright.) --Coppertwig 01:46, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, I'm kindof new to this too. I wasn't sure exactly what the requirements were. Anyway, follow the official instructions by Finngall given above and on the page Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission, not the suggestions I made in the above paragraph that I wasn't sure about and some of which were wrong. If you follow the instructions correctly and completely you should be able to create the page and not have it deleted for copyright infringement. (It was deleted twice for copyright infringement and a third time which I'm not sure whether it was for copyright infringement again or some other reason.) --Coppertwig 21:57, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Wobfc logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Wobfc logo.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:07, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Waverley Old Boys FC

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Waverley Old Boys FC, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Mattinbgn\ ^talk 23:23, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Not every football club meets Wikipedia's requirements for inclusion and I consider that this club in particular as an amateur club at a relatively low level of competition does not meet Wikipedia's guidelines for notability. Specifically, it does not meet the notability guidelines for organisations. The Football WikiProject may give you more assistance on how you can improve this article to have it kept.

If you think the article is suitable for inclusion, you can remove the PROD tag. It helps, but is not strictly necessary to give a reason why it should be kept when doing so. If the tag is removed I will probably take the article to Articles for Deletion to allow the community to consider if this should be kept or otherwise. -- Mattinbgn\ ^talk 00:29, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Waverley Old Boys FC

Waverley Old Boys FC, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Waverley Old Boys FC satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waverley Old Boys FC and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Waverley Old Boys FC during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Mattinbgn\ ^talk 00:33, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

The AFD discussion for the Locomotiv Cove article is here - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lokomotiv Cove FC. Have a read of the arguments put up there and see if they apply to your club. Remember, arguing that other stuff is kept is unlikely to be taken seriously as a good argument. -- Mattinbgn\ ^talk 00:43, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

If you follow this link - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lokomotiv Cove FC you can see the discussion about deleting the Locomotiv Cove article. If you go here - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waverley Old Boys FC you can put your case to keep the article. The decision to keep is not mine, I am not an administrator, but will be made by consensus. Adding independent sources such as articles in the Dydney Morning Herald and Daily Telegraph may help, but the club really needs to play at at least State League level to be considered notable in my eyes. You really need to read WP:N and WP:ORG to see what Wikipedia generally considers notable. -- Mattinbgn\ ^talk 01:06, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

September 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Talk:Waverley Old Boys FC. Please be careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mattinbgn\ ^talk 00:45, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 00:54, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Wobfc.jpg

The file File:Wobfc.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 06:19, 18 December 2018 (UTC)