Welcome!

Hello, Anthonyvierneza, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Anthony vierneza, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 03:40, 7 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Anthony vierneza

edit
 

The article Anthony vierneza has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability is asserted, but this seems like a hoax. Probable WP:COI. Fails WP:V.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 03:40, 7 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Anthony vierneza

edit
 

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Anthony vierneza. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony vierneza. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:05, 8 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

December 2009

edit

  Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Anthony vierneza. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. ClubOranjeT 08:50, 9 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Anthony vierneza, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ClubOranjeT 08:52, 9 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

  This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Anthony vierneza. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. ClubOranjeT 09:02, 9 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 09:42, 9 December 2009 (UTC)Reply