User talk:Ant N York/sandbox

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Cgchapman

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback

Name of student reviewer: User: Cgchapman

Replace with username for version on talk page**


Date of review: 05/10/2013


Name of editor: User: Ant_N_York

Replace with username for version on talk page**


URL of editor’s Userpage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ant_N_York/sandbox/


Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page: 05/10/2013


Date review submitted to instructor:


Length of edit (too long/too short): Good length


Image (needed/appropriate): Not needed


Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): Edit information accurate to textbook


Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed: N/A


Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych): Edit information accurate and relevant to I/O Psychology


Wikiformatting: Good Formatting


Grammar & composition: Good grammer


Other comments:None

Cgchapman (talk) 16:01, 10 May 2013 (UTC)Reply



Name of student reviewer **Replace with username for version on talk page** Wikipedia User: Keronica Grant
Date of review 5/8/2013
Name of editor**Replace with username for version on talk page** Wikipedia User: Ant_N_York
URL of editor’s Userpage http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ant_N_York/sandbox#Personality_Sandbox/Personality
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 5/8/2013
Date review submitted to instructor 5/8/2013
Length of edit (too long/too short) perfect length
Image (needed/appropriate)
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed Primary
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) The article information was relevant to I/O Psych topic
Wikiformatting External link was good
Grammar & composition None
Other comments Good Job

--Keronica Grant (talk) 04:19, 9 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Name of student reviewer **Replace with username for version on talk page Wikipedia User:Aaleksanian
Date of review 5/8/2013
Name of editor**Replace with username for version on talk page Wikipedia User: Ant_N_York
URL of editor’s Userpage http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ant_N_York/sandbox#Personality_Sandbox/Personality
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 5/8/2013
Date review submitted to instructor 5/8/2013
Length of edit (too long/too short) Enough for edit
Image (needed/appropriate) Image not necessary
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Information provided accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) N/A
Wikiformatting External link was good
Grammar & composition Well done
Other comments Good Job




Name of student reviewer **Replace with username for version on talk page** Wikipedia User:Fernando18
Date of review 5/8/2013
Name of editor**Replace with username for version on talk page** Wikipedia User: Ant_N_York
URL of editor’s Userpage http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ant_N_York/sandbox#Personality_Sandbox/Personality
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 5/8/2013
Date review submitted to instructor 5/8/2013
Length of edit (too long/too short) Neither perfect length
Image (needed/appropriate) Good image showed great details.
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Very accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed Primary
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) The article information was relevant to I/O Psych topic
Wikiformatting External link was good
Grammar & composition None
Other comments Good Job
Name of student reviewer **Replace with username for version on talk page Wikipedia User:Aaleksanian
Date of review 5/8/2013
Name of editor**Replace with username for version on talk page Wikipedia User: Ant_N_York
URL of editor’s Userpage http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ant_N_York/sandbox#Personality_Sandbox/Personality
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 5/8/2013
Date review submitted to instructor 5/8/2013
Length of edit (too long/too short) Enough for edit
Image (needed/appropriate) Image not necessary
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Information provided accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) N/A
Wikiformatting External link was good
Grammar & composition Well done
Other comments Good Job



Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback Name of student reviewer: Hmehta0120

Date of review: 5/8/2013

Name of editor: Ant_N_York

URL of editor’s Userpage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ant_N_York/sandbox#Personality_Sandbox/Personality

Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page: 5/8/2013

Date review submitted to instructor: 5/8/2013 Length of edit: I find your length well. Provide the information in a simple and great manner.

Image (needed/appropriate): N/A- I would recommend you add an image because there are many wiki editors of that page that have added images. So if possible I would saw add an image.

Review of textbook information: Very accurate to the textbook, and liked how you cited the textbook.

Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed:N/A

Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych):N/A

Wikiformatting: reat wiki formation. Paragraph form and like the way you bought in external links throughout the format.

Grammar & composition: Found no errors, looks good to me.

Other comments: Great edit, like the formatting of it. And if you add an image would help you get more creativity points. Great Job! Good Luck

Hmehta0120 (talk) 21:39, 8 May 2013 (UTC)Reply


Name of student reviewer **Replace with username for version on talk page** Wikipedia User:Trinirebel (talk) 02:27, 9 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
Date of review 5/8/2013
Name of editor**Replace with username for version on talk page** Wikipedia User: Ant_N_York
URL of editor’s Userpage http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ant_N_York/sandbox#Personality_Sandbox/Personality
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 5/8/2013
Date review submitted to instructor 5/8/2013
Length of edit (too long/too short) Appropriate lenght
Image (needed/appropriate) None required for this edit
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Very accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) The article information was relevant to I/O Psych topic
Wikiformatting External link was good
Grammar & composition Perfect
Other comments exemplary edit

Trinirebel (talk) 02:27, 9 May 2013 (UTC)Reply


Name of student reviewer **Replace with username for version on talk page Aisha Hamid
Date of review 5/9/2013
Name of editor**Replace with username for version on talk page Wikipedia User: Ant_N_York
URL of editor’s Userpage http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ant_N_York/sandbox#Personality_Sandbox/Personality
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 5/9/2013
Date review submitted to instructor 5/9/2013
Length of edit (too long/too short) Perfect
Image (needed/appropriate) N/A- but I recommend you add an image will give you extra bonus points, and will complete the wiki page.
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) N/A
Wikiformatting Great Formatting especially using the worlds are external links Grammar & composition Information is very well put together.
Other comments Over all great edit. Like the formatting a lot!

Aisha Hamid (talk) 17:49, 9 May 2013 (UTC)Reply