Speedy deletion nomination of BaconBear03

edit

Hello Anonymous333719,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged BaconBear03 for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia and im mean. lol haha

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 18:21, 3 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of BaconBear03

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on BaconBear03 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Zupotachyon (talkcontribs) Ping me with {{SUBST:reply to|Zupotachyon}} 18:48, 3 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Anonymous333719, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Anonymous333719! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Soni (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

November 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm EncyclopediaUpdaticus. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to H.G. Wells have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. EncyclopediaUpdaticus (talk) 16:46, 19 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at H.G. Wells. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. EncyclopediaUpdaticus (talk) 04:39, 20 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Nuclear power, you may be blocked from editing. DVdm (talk) 16:16, 27 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

May 2018

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Jaime Rodríguez Calderón has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:14, 23 May 2018 (UTC)Reply