Absconditus
Userboxes
|
Notice: I check my e-mail at least once a day so there is no need to add here the template «you've got mail».
My accounts from old SULs are user:River01 and user:Krivitsky MC.
If I left you a message on your talkpage, please respond there
If you leave me a message here, I will respond here.
Feel free to notice me about a spelling/grammar mistake which I could make (both in mainspace and other namespaces); that will help me to improve my English skills.
Anyone can make a mistake. A fool insists on repeating it.
Now I have rollback permission. I have never needed instructors to deal with vandals.
Please remember WP:CIVIL while posting something here.
I confirm that I am the owner of SUL "River01", "Krivitsky_MC", "Anonim.one" and local accounts in the name of "Absconditus" (currently in ruwiki and enwiki). 07:34, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
Check your e-mail
edit
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.--Ricvelozo (talk) 03:26, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks! ♪ anonim.one ♪ 19:45, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
Talkback: DoriSmith
edit
Message added 00:11, 29 December 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hi Anonim.one. Thanks for your feedback. Can I check, is this your only Wikipedia account? If not, can I point you in the direction of this article? Apologies if this is your only account. Garemoko (talk) 22:18, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
- No, I have one or two accounts because I was renamed twice in the Russian Wikipedia and these are from my SUL's. And once I created an account for several edits in music articles, but as far as I remember there was no breaking the policy about sock puppets. And why do you think I have a sock? If you have a good evidence(s), of course, you may make a request to checkusers. P. S. In the Russian Wikipedia I was twice accused of virtuality and twice checkusers denied this. P. P. S. Enlish is not my native language, so sorry for possible grammar mistakes. P.P.P.S. Please, correct the distortion of my nickname. ♪ anonim.one ♪ 22:31, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
- This looked like a second account because it was relatively unused account but you seemed to have a good understanding of Wikipedia. It may be worth you creating links between the talk pages or user pages of your multiple accounts to avoid you getting accused of sock puppetry. I'm not accusing you of this, just suggesting that the article might be helpful in you avoiding the accusation from others in future. Garemoko (talk) 22:54, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
- «you seemed to have a good understanding of Wikipedia» — I definetely can't but have it, because I have contributed the Russian Wikipedia during almost a year (through two days it will be a year). Look at my SUL and this one and that one. When I have «en-3», probably, I will edit more regularly there, but not now. ♪ anonim.one ♪ 07:38, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
- This looked like a second account because it was relatively unused account but you seemed to have a good understanding of Wikipedia. It may be worth you creating links between the talk pages or user pages of your multiple accounts to avoid you getting accused of sock puppetry. I'm not accusing you of this, just suggesting that the article might be helpful in you avoiding the accusation from others in future. Garemoko (talk) 22:54, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
Talkback: RHaworth
edit You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Why on earth request e-mail? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:31, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi Anonim.one,
We don't generally add RFA pages to WP:RFA unless the candidate has indicated that's what he wants to do. in this case, it's pretty obvious that it was just a test page; there is absolutely 0% chance of a successful RFA. I've removed the page from the RFA list. If you run across these in the future, then you can theoretically ask the candidate if they need help adding it to the list, but even then, if someone needs help adding the RFA to the page, there is no way it will be successful. So I wouldn't personally recommend that.
Thanks, though, for trying to help out another editor. Cheers. --Floquenbeam (talk) 20:10, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
- As I wrote in the edit summary, «I am afraid it will be closed as NOTNOW, but you should see it for closing». Okay, I am not an experienced user, so I didn't know about such practise. (in ru-wiki such RFA are just speedily deleted, but I was not sure, that in that Wikipedia I should do the same thing). ♪ anonim.one ♪ 20:18, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
- No problems, I've left a note for Zakawer. We're not quite so organized here; half the time we speedy delete these as test pages, and half the time we try to convince the editor to request speedy deletion themselves. But actually transcluding it would be setting him up for a bunch of Opposes, which can drive new users away. Cheers. --Floquenbeam (talk) 20:23, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: List of in the house episodes
editHello Anonim.one. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of List of in the house episodes, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: this are completely different articles, it's both about episodes of a tv show which has 'house' in its name, but that's where the comparison ends. Thank you. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 11:24, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
Amy Brooke edit
editYour edit here was unnecessary. She's American, so pounds is the proper measurement. Also, 110 lbs is equivalent to 50 kg. Furthermore, the first reference in the article, which is also used for her height, could have been used for the weight. Dismas|(talk) 13:17, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
- OK. ♪ anonim.one ♪ 13:19, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
WP:MMA
editHello,
i noticed you edited a Mixed Martial Arts page in August, but you haven't listed yourself as a Participant on the Wikiproject for Mixed Martial Arts pages. I've decided to try to drum up interest to get more people involved!
Kevlar (talk) 00:11, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
- Didn't you see the userbox "user out of projects" at the top of this page? I'm not going to participate projects until I find more free time and can help not with flooding, but with expanding of articles. Now I can't for variety reasons. Further more, I often do kind of works I am interested in at the time (for example, speedy deletion nominations), then break it and move to the next kind of works once I lose interent to the previous one. So you have to invite me to a lot of wiki projects then. ♪ anonim.one ♪ 19:39, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
Welcome to STiki
edit|
Hello, Anonim.one, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Here are some pages which are a little more fun:
We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and Yaris678 (talk) 12:29, 19 October 2012 (UTC) |
|
did you vote?
edithi there, your vote in ArbCom elections triggered a spoof CSRF alarm. Would you be so kind as to please confirm that you actually voted? :) Apologies for the inconvenience. Pundit|utter 07:41, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, I voted. Please, next time use a full name instead of an abbreviation. I had to spend a couple of minutes to figure out what "CSRF" means. ♪ anonim.one ♪ 08:09, 12 December 2012 (UTC) Using the top button "New section" for adding a new topic would be nice as well. ♪ anonim.one ♪ 18:18, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
Renaming in huwiki
editHello! User:Absconditus is yours in huwiki, you can sign in with this name. Regards, RepliCarter (talk) 12:19, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
- OK, thank you very much! Absconditus 13:46, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
edit
Hello, Absconditus. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)