Anfwepgnrwfinre

October 2021

Hello, I'm Binksternet. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of one-hit wonders in the United States, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 18:13, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to YoungBoy Never Broke Again. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 18:15, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Invasion of Privacy (album), you may be blocked from editing. LightPirate (talk) 20:39, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lil Xian. LightPirate (talk) 20:40, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. FMSky (talk) 16:44, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  clpo13_(talk) 17:02, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

October 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Magnolia Projects have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Magnolia Projects was changed by Anfwepgnrwfinre (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.903948 on 2021-10-20T15:17:12+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:17, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

October 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Migos have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Migos was changed by Anfwepgnrwfinre (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.889329 on 2021-10-26T19:45:35+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:45, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

November 2021

Hello, I'm Dark-World25. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Lana Del Rey, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dark-World25 (talk) 15:36, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jake Paul, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dark-World25 (talk) 02:14, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Midwest emo, you may be blocked from editing. Woodroar (talk) 22:24, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions notification

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Woodroar (talk) 00:19, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

December 2021

Look, your unsourced editing needs to stop. This is considered original research and it's not what Wikipedia is for. We're here to summarize what reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy say about subjects and you should be citing those sources, not adding your own interpretations. This is especially important for claims about living persons. If you have any questions, please ask! If your unsourced edits continue, you will likely be blocked from editing. Woodroar (talk) 16:43, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

I'm not trying to vandalize articles, I just have trouble with citing my sources, and I don't understand the coding process. I usually stick with talk pages/small grammatical edits for this reason. I apologize for any harm that may have been caused. Anfwepgnrwfinre (talk) 17:47, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

That's understandable! Everyone has to start somewhere. I recommend reading Wikipedia:Citing sources, our guide to, well, citing your sources. It's in-depth but important. If that's too much, there's the abridged Referencing for beginners.

To make it easier, there are tools you can use to add citations. There's a list at WP:CITEGENERATORS. I prefer ProveIt, which you can enable in your preferences. It's as easy as opening ProveIt, pasting in the source URL, and ProveIt fills in as much as it can. It's not always 100% effective but it make citing almost painless.

If you have any questions, please ask! Woodroar (talk) 18:05, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for accommodating me! Anfwepgnrwfinre (talk) 18:11, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

ANI notification

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Anfwepgnrwfinre and sourcing. Thank you. Woodroar (talk) 23:04, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

@Anfwepgnrwfinre: In this edit at Chantel Jeffries you added text asserting that Jeffries "was dating" a certain person and that her vocals were used on a certain song. There are two issues with that. First, you have already been blocked for "Persistent addition of unsourced content". Information added to articles must be verifiable. Particularly for an article on a living person (see WP:BLP), you must include a reliable source. Second, by introducing two concepts in a statement (dating and vocals) your text makes an assertion there is an association between the two—an association that warrants mention in a BLP article. That is known as WP:SYNTH (synthesis) and is not permitted. Actually, there is a third issue, namely that who-is-currently-dating-whom is best left for gossip sites and should not be mentioned unless reliable sources explain the significance. I will block you for an extended period if there are further problems along these lines. Please respond at the thread linked just above. Johnuniq (talk) 02:28, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

I understand that relationships aren't necessary for smaller pages, but the song that Jefferies was featured on with someone she was linked with was a mainstream success, hence I thought it was fitting to add to her musical page. Anfwepgnrwfinre (talk) 17:40, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

There is an essential point that you are missing. Editors (for example, you) must not add information that they know or believe to be true. Instead, you must find a reliable source and paraphrase what it says, and include the source in your edit so it can be checked by others. There are a bunch of complex citation templates for this purpose but you can ignore them. This is a wiki and someone else will clean them up. Just do something like this:

<ref>title "This is the title of the article/book", author "This is the name of the author if stated", date "The date published if known, url https://www.example.com/info/page.html</ref>

You must stop adding information unless you accompany that information with a source. Also, using your judgement about what is "fitting to add" is the wrong approach. If a reliable source has pointed out that connection, it may be appropriate (WP:DUE) to include the information. If it is just your judgement, you should put it on your personal blog, not Wikipedia.

Don't try to understand all Wikipedia's procedures at once. You must start by absorbing what I have said about reliable sources. After that, we can discuss more. Questions can be asked at WP:Teahouse. Johnuniq (talk) 23:34, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Whipped-cream charger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gunna. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 8 January 2022 (UTC)