August 2020 edit

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   DGG ( talk ) 09:22, 31 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Andrewzwj (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I created another account to edit a similar article without knowing that it is a violation against the Wikipedia policy. I am trying to be objective when editing the article and have cited multiple reliable sources such as Reuters and Bloomberg. From now on, I will follow Wikipedia's guideline closely related to content editing. Please do reconsider my ban. Thank you.

Decline reason:

Having reviewed your contributions, I don't see a reason to lift this block early. I would be willing to reconsider this request if you promise to stay away from editing topics that attract spam, such as companies, biographies and recent media releases. signed, Rosguill talk 05:52, 21 September 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.