June 2021

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to La ilaha illallah have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:21, 25 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to La ilaha illallah. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 09:29, 25 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

June 2021

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to La ilaha illallah have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:27, 30 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

July 2021

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Muhammad and the Bible, you may be blocked from editing. tgeorgescu (talk) 20:17, 2 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

Your recent editing history at La ilaha illallah shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. tgeorgescu (talk) 20:18, 2 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Sorry I have to make others put this on watchlist Andrew Logan Martin (talk) 20:24, 2 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

I won't stop making edits . Andrew Logan Martin (talk) 20:25, 2 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

This is just endless. Andrew Logan Martin (talk) 20:27, 2 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

I can do anything Andrew Logan Martin (talk) 20:28, 2 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Rather than persistently edit war, you need to explain your changes at Talk:Muhammad and the Bible. Make it clear how what you're adding enhances the article and what reliable sources, preferably secondary, back the changes up. —C.Fred (talk) 20:29, 2 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Sorry I will make edits when inactive. Andrew Logan Martin (talk) 20:30, 2 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

What do you mean by "when inactive"? —C.Fred (talk) 20:31, 2 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

I don't won't to say repeated things. I will do what I have to . I don't need to discuss with anyone. Andrew Logan Martin (talk) 20:31, 2 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Inactive Andrew Logan Martin (talk) 20:32, 2 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Inactive meaning not active Andrew Logan Martin (talk) 20:32, 2 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Longhair\talk 20:32, 2 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Yeah nice Andrew Logan Martin (talk) 20:34, 2 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Love you dude keep on doing this I don't get hurt. Andrew Logan Martin (talk) 20:34, 2 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

I will do what I have to keep on blocking. Andrew Logan Martin (talk) 20:36, 2 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Tread lightly. It would be easy to interpret the statement above as you stating that you have no intend of editing cooperatively—in which case your account could be blocked indefinitely because you aren't here to build an encyclopedia. —C.Fred (talk) 20:37, 2 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

I have lot of ip address keep on blocking. Andrew Logan Martin (talk) 20:38, 2 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

I don't care about blocks. I am here to put others on watchlist I will make sure I will have it done . Andrew Logan Martin (talk) 20:39, 2 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  Longhair\talk 20:40, 2 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Salim567 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Salim567. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 15:10, 7 July 2021 (UTC)Reply