An editor edits

W.B Yeats September 1913

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of W.B Yeats September 1913, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.eliteskills.com/analysis_poetry/September_1913_by_William_Butler_Yeats_analysis.php.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 11:27, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of W.B Yeats September 1913

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on W.B Yeats September 1913 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Hazara Birar ^(Talk) 11:45, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of W.B Yeats September 1913

The article W.B Yeats September 1913 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article is a poem by W.B. Yeats. Yeats died in 1939, so I feel copyright doesn't come in, but Wikipedia is not a collection of poems.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Peridon (talk) 12:25, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, but

we don't usually put whole poems up as stand alone articles. I note your contribution to O'Leary's article, and would suggest either adding the link to the complete text as an External Link to O'Leary, or possibly putting verse three in the Tribute section, wikilinking terms like 'wild geese', and the names, to emphasise Yeats' comparison of O'Leary to those figures. Any queris, please contact me on my talk page. Peridon (talk) 13:06, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Poetry

Hi, I saw that you enjoy documenting poetry on Wikipedia. Since Wikipedia isn't really the place for full poems, you might like Wikisouce instead! There you can transcribe poetry until the cows come home :) It's part of the Wikipedia family. You can visit it here: http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Main_Page See ya around! Sarah (talk) 20:55, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! An editor edits, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Sarah (talk) 20:55, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sam and the Womp

A tag has been placed on Sam and the Womp requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mr. Vernon (talk) 23:43, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

The article was deleted because at the time of deletion, you did not mention any connection to Stiff Records, their chart performance, or their rotation on BBC1. You are welcome to recreate the article if you can provide the necessary sources to verify those criteria. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:06, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

I have userfyied the article to your user space at User:An editor edits/Sam and the Womp. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 15:47, 15 August 2012 (UTC)