Hi everybody! Olá a toda a gente! Comment ca va, mes amis wikipedians? Привет всем! Hallo alle! Ciao a tutti! Здравейте всички!Hallo iedereen! Merhaba herkes! Hola a todos! 안녕하십니까! Γεια σε όλους!

Proposed deletion of Liberal Revolution of 1817 edit

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Liberal Revolution of 1817, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

POV-article about something not considered a "rebellion"

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Ironholds (talk) 13:21, 3 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Pedro António Avondano edit

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Pedro António Avondano, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://orgs.usd.edu/nmm/GiftShop/CDs/Lanzelotte.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:55, 19 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Pedro António Avondano edit

 

A tag has been placed on Pedro António Avondano requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Darrenhusted (talk) 02:51, 20 November 2009 (UTC)Reply