Proposed deletion of John Carden Wolfe

edit
 

The article John Carden Wolfe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

seems to fail WP:NBASIC guidelines. Citations refer to blog posts, op-ed articles, and a set of images that went viral. Ref #5 isn't about the J. Wolfe in question, and all of the books are self-published.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joyous! | Talk 18:38, 3 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of TestCrew for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article TestCrew is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TestCrew until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

KH-1 (talk) 05:00, 11 March 2023 (UTC)Reply